Vol. 15 nº 3 - Jul/Aug/Set de 2021
Original Article Pages 331 to 338
 

Treatment of the behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia: a narrative review
Tratamento da variante comportamental da demência frontotemporal: uma revisão narrativa

Authors: Leandro Boson Gambogi1,2; Henrique Cerqueira Guimarães1; Leonardo Cruz de Souza1,2; Paulo Caramelli1,2

PDF

Descriptors: behavior control, drug therapy, frontotemporal dementia, review.
Descritores:
controle comportamental, farmacoterapia, demência frontotemporal, revisão.

ABSTRACT:
Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder accompanied by behavioral and personality changes and/or language deterioration. Its behavioral variant (bvFTD) is the main clinical presentation. Objective: This study aims to investigate the treatment alternatives for bvFTD available so far.
METHODS: We conducted a narrative review of bvFTD treatment options. We used PubMed and Lilacs databases with the terms "frontotemporal dementia" or "behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia" combined with "treatment," "pharmacological treatment," or "disease-modifying drugs."
RESULTS: The articles retrieved and selected in the research pointed out that there is no specific treatment approved for bvFTD so far. The current proposals are limited to handle the cardinal behavioral symptoms of the disorder. Disease-modifying drugs are under development and may be promising, especially in the monogenic presentations of FTD.
CONCLUSIONS: There are numerous approaches to treat the core symptoms of bvFTD, most of them based on low-quality research. To date, there are no drugs with a disease-specific therapeutic recommendation for bvFTD. Treatments are often investigated guided by primary psychiatric disorders with similar symptoms and should be chosen by the predominant symptom profile.

RESUMO:
A demência frontotemporal (DFT) é um transtorno neurodegenerativo progressivo acompanhado de deterioração do comportamento e da personalidade e/ou da linguagem. A variante comportamental (DFTvc) é a principal apresentação clínica.
OBJETIVOS: Investigar as alternativas de tratamento disponíveis para a DFTvc até o momento.
MÉTODOS: Realizou-se uma revisão narrativa das opções de tratamento da DFTvc. Os bancos de dados PubMed e Lilacs foram utilizados com os termos "demência frontotemporal" ou "variante comportamental da demência frontotemporal" combinados com "tratamento", "tratamento farmacológico" ou "drogas modificadoras de doença".
RESULTADOS: Os artigos recuperados e selecionados na pesquisa indicaram que não há nenhum tratamento específico aprovado até o momento para DFTvc. As propostas atuais são limitadas ao tratamento dos sintomas comportamentais cardinais do transtorno. As drogas modificadoras de doença estão em desenvolvimento e podem ser promissoras, especialmente nas apresentações monogênicas da DFT.
CONCLUSÕES: Há inúmeras abordagens para tratar os principais sintomas DFTvc, a maioria delas baseada em pesquisas de baixa qualidade. Até o momento, não existem medicamentos com uma recomendação terapêutica específica para a DFTvc. Os tratamentos são frequentemente investigados guiados por distúrbios psiquiátricos primários com sintomas semelhantes e devem ser escolhidos pelo perfil de sintomas predominante.

INTRODUCTION

Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is a neurodegenerative disorder typically associated with progressive behavioral and personality changes and/or language deterioration. The first FTD diagnostic criteria were proposed by a consortium of researchers in Lund (Sweden) and Manchester (England) in 1994.1 These criteria were further refined by an international consensus in 1998.2 On that occasion, the term "frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD)" was recommended for a broad spectrum of clinical conditions, from those with predominant behavioral changes to those with predominant language symptoms (primary progressive aphasia). Subsequently, the term FTLD was reserved for histopathological diagnosis. The clinical criteria for the diagnosis of behavioral variant (bvFTD) were revised in 2011, resulting in improvements in sensitivity.3

FTLD is considered as the second most frequent cause of early-onset dementia, with a prevalence estimated at 22 per 100,000 person-years among individuals aged between 45 and 64 years;4,5 about 25-30% of the cases occur in individuals aged 65 years or older.6 bvFTD constitutes the most common presentation form with the highest rate of inheritance and earlier onset, followed by language presentations. Around 40-50% of FTD cases present a positive family history, with 10% showing an autosomal dominant pattern.7 The most common monogenetic inheritance occur in microtubule-associated protein tau (MAPT), chromosome 9 open reading frame 72 (C9ORF72), and progranulin (GRN) genes, representing 25% of FTD cases.8

Since 2011,3 a bvFTD clinical presentation can be verified in the presence of progressive behavioral changes and/or cognitive deterioration, characterized by at least three of the six possible core symptoms: (1) social disinhibition; (2) apathy; (3) loss of sympathy or empathy; (4) persevering, stereotyped, or compulsive behavior; (5) hyperorality and dietary changes; and (6) neuropsychological profile characterized by executive dysfunction, with relative preservation of episodic memory and visuospatial abilities. The diagnosis is considered potential when there is a functional impairment as well as a frontal and/or temporal atrophy, evidenced by structural neuroimaging, and/or perfusion/metabolism deficits in the above-mentioned topography according to the functional neuroimaging studies. A definitive diagnosis of bvFTD is reserved only for cases with histopathological confirmation and/or the presence of a known pathogenetic mutation.3

Those core diagnostic symptoms of bvFTD result in significant stress to families and caregivers,9 and frequently these patients exhibit risky and even criminal behaviors.10 Therefore, the search for treatments that can attenuate symptoms or prevent progression of disease is of major relevance. To date, there is no effective disease-modifying therapy, and merely a few small studies have shown benefit of symptomatic pharmacological approaches. The design of interventional studies for FTD is challenging; there is low prevalence of FTD in the general population, lack of recognized diagnostic biomarkers, multiple clinical phenotypes, and genetic/pathological heterogeneity.

Many drugs, with distinct pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic characteristics, have been investigated as treatments for different symptoms of bvFTD. In addition, a variety of tools and scales with diverse psychometric properties have been used to measure the effects of these tested drugs. Trieu et al.11 have covered this topic in a recent systematic review. They included 23 studies reporting a total of 573 subjects and provided an overview of all the pharmacological treatment approaches that were taken targeting the main symptoms of bvFTD. It is a highly informative publication, but with a more complex text and harder consultation. In contrast, this article proposes leaner orientations that could guide clinical practice based on hypothetical theory on the mechanism of action of the drugs on each symptom. We hence offer a narrative review of the main approaches to treat this clinical condition.


METHODS

We conducted a narrative review of the literature during 2020 through Lilacs and PubMed databases, using the words "treatment," "pharmacological treatment," and "disease-modifying drugs," all of them combined with "frontotemporal dementia" or "behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia." When indicated, other bibliographies were consulted from the reference lists of these articles. Only articles published in English or Portuguese were eligible, and there was no selection based on the publication date. The titles and abstracts of all the articles retrieved were read to identify the articles that addressed the topic and the purpose of this review.


RESULTS

Pharmacological treatment: overview


In sum, the articles retrieved pointed out that there are no approved drugs with specific indication for bvFTD. Pharmacological treatment is so far symptomatic, based on the case reports, small cases series, and a few open or controlled clinical trials (Table 1).




Unlike Alzheimer's disease (AD), there is a relative preservation of the cholinergic system in bvFTD,42 and despite the lack of expectation, some cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEI) have been tested in RCT,17 open-label trial,26 and case series.34 Except in an open-label study with rivastigmine,26 these drugs did not lead to improvement in cognition or behavior17 and even worsened the symptoms in patients with bvFTD in a case series.34 Memantine has also been studied, and the results were equally negative, including two RCTs.18,28,29,33 Regardless, about 40% of patients diagnosed with bvFTD still receive ChEI or memantine at some point during their treatment according to the data collected in California, USA, and Girona, Spain.43-45

The most important abnormalities in bvFTD occur in dopaminergic and, especially, serotoninergic systems.42 Thus, the few studies with positive results grounded on better level of evidence, including three RCTs12-14 and two open-label studies,23,25,27 pertain to drugs acting on monoaminergic systems, especially serotonergic medications, such as the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI). Two small RCTs and one case series have also evaluated psychostimulant medications in bvFTD, pointing to subtle improvements in apathy, disinhibition, and abnormal risk-taking behavior, but the results were not replicated in studies with larger sample sizes.15,16,37

Moclobemide, a monoamine oxidase inhibitor (MAOI), has shown minor improvement in behavior, speech, and motor stereotype in an open-label study with six subjects.24 Selegiline, another MAOI, was found to improve the behavioral symptoms of three patients with probable FTD in a case series.31 The new antidepressant agomelatine improved apathy compared with melatonin in bvFTD patients.21

Whereas antipsychotics are commonly used to manage challenging behaviors, the rationale for their use in bvFTD emerges chiefly from uncontrolled case series and clinical reports.35,38,44,46

Pharmacological treatments according to drug class

A practical way to assess the evidence regarding bvFTD symptomatic treatment is through drug class (Table 2).




Antidepressants, especially SSRIs, have been tested for the symptomatic treatment of bvFTD. Paroxetine, citalopram, fluvoxamine, and trazodone improved behavioral symptoms, but not cognition. Sertraline decreased stereotypical movements, and moclobemide produced slight improvement in behavioral symptoms.12-14,23,25,27

Although antipsychotics are traditionally used to control challenging behaviors, the evidence supporting their use in bvFTD comes essentially from uncontrolled case series and clinical reports. Besides the increased cardiovascular risk associated with these medications, almost all antipsychotics involve the risk of extrapyramidal side effects, to which patients with bvFTD are especially susceptible.35 Quetiapine has been shown to be effective in reducing agitation in case series, but showed no significant changes in NPI in a small double-blind trial.16 Risperidone and aripiprazole have been reported to improve agitation and improper behaviors in case series.35,36 Olanzapine was reported to improve NPI score in 17 patients with bvFTD in an open-label trial.32

Psychostimulants, such as methylphenidate and dextroamphetamine, are another class of drugs that should be used with extreme caution for FTD behaviors, as adverse results are not uncommon.47 These drugs modulate dopamine and have shown potentially positive preliminary results in behavioral symptoms of dementia, especially apathy.48

There are only few case reports suggesting improvement with anticonvulsants in the behavioral symptoms of bvFTD.39-41 Hence, there is a lack of more supportive evidence to suggest the routine use of antiepileptic drugs for bvFTD behavioral symptoms. This class of agents has substantial side effects that should be considered regarding their potential benefits.49

Pharmacological treatments: symptom-focused approach

The use of pharmacological approach toward core or most disturbing bvFTD symptoms constitutes a standard clinical practice.11 Core bvFTD symptoms amenable to pharmacological interventions with available evidence of benefit are disinhibition, compulsive/perseverative behavior, hyperorality, apathy, and loss of sympathy/empathy (Table 3).




Disinhibition

Disinhibition is one of the most stressful symptoms of bvFTD, encompassing impulsivity, hypersexuality, risk behavior, legal infringements, embarrassment, and personal exposure. There is a probable link between disinhibition and serotonergic neurotransmission disruption in bvFTD patients, which showed a marked decrease in serotonin 5HT1A and 5-HT2A receptor-binding potential.50,51 This is the theoretical basis for antidepressant response in this form of dementia, especially SSRIs. As said, based on low-quality studies in bvFTD and evidence on symptom control of other psychiatric conditions, antipsychotics could be used to manage challenging and hazardous behavior, but with caution due to extrapyramidal and cardiovascular risks.44

Compulsive and perseverative behaviors

Compulsive and perseverative behaviors are manifested by collectionism, motor or vocal stereotypies, repetitive or ritualistic behaviors, and perseveration. The therapeutic target is the serotoninergic system and the reduced level of 5HT1A and 5HT2A receptors, especially those in the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC).52 Decreased functioning of 5-HT2A receptors in the OFC could lead to abnormalities that potentially explain OFC-striatal hyperactivity found in OCD imaging studies.53 This is possibly the reason why SSRIs and trazodone have been considered efficacious treatment options in studies with fair quality of evidence.12-14,23,25,27

Hyperorality

Hyperorality is characterized by dietary changes such as gluttony, binge, or indiscriminate eating, and increased sweet preference, alcohol, and cigarette abuse. Moreover, patients disclose oral exploration and consumption of inedible items, particularly in more advanced stages of dementia. Hyperorality in bvFTD probably results from the involvement of the posterior hypothalamus and severe loss of brain serotonin neurotransmission, especially in 5HT1A receptor.54 5HT1A receptors are associated, among other behaviors, with impulsivity and appetite.30 Thus, serotoninergic anti-depressants may help manage hyperorality in bvFTD patients and are well tolerated.12,25 Lebert et al. demonstrated trazodone efficacy in a sample of bvFTD patients according to NPI scores, including dietary changes.14

Jesso et al. found that oxytocin was associated with reduced NPI scores, as well as appetite and eating abnormalities.19 The antiepileptic drug topiramate seems to be an option to treat hyperorality; however, caution should be taken regarding its deleterious effects on cognition.41,55

Apathy

There is extensive evidence, especially from non-human animal studies,56 that dopaminergic deficits result in less-motivated behavior, which resembles the behavior of patients with apathy.57 Thus, psychostimulants such as methylphenidate and dextroamphetamine are usually prescribed to treat apathy in bvFTD.47 A Cochrane paper suggested that methylphenidate was the only drug with positive response in apathy, although this evidence was primarily obtained in AD patients' samples.48 Finger et al. investigated the use of intranasal oxytocin and suggested that it may improve the levels of apathy.58

Loss of empathy/sympathy

Loss of empathy is manifested as diminished social interest and response to other people's needs and feelings. Jesso et al. found that oxytocin was associated with reduced identification of negative facial expressions (anger and fear).19 It has been hypothesized that reduced perception of negative facial expressions may improve cooperative behavior. Finger et al. also found that intranasal oxytocin may promote expressions of empathy.58

Fortasyn ConnectTM, a nutraceutical compound thought to positively enhance synaptic function, was studied in 24 bvFTD subjects. Patients were enrolled and randomized to Fortasyn ConnectTM (125 mL/day) or placebo groups. This nutraceutical was found to reduce behavioral deficits and improve social cognition, as demonstrated by an increase in the Theory of Mind skills compared with placebo.21 However, this was a proof-of-concept study, with a small number of subjects. It represents early-stage data that have not been confirmed by another research.

Parkinsonism

Many patients with bvFTD display parkinsonism, including trembling, stiffness, movement difficulties, and bradykinesia. Regrettably, parkinsonism in bvFTD is not well manageable. Patients are minimally responsive to levodopa. Treatment of parkinsonism, therefore, should be oriented by standard practices established for the management of idiopathic Parkinson's disease (levodopa and dopaminergic agonists). Whether this can exacerbate behavioral symptoms in bvFTD is still unknown.59

Non-pharmacological treatments

The current quality of evidence regarding non-pharmacological interventions for the behavioral symptoms of dementia is weak. In general, there is still a lack of strong and conclusive evidence on which non-pharmacological interventions should be specifically chosen by health professionals who care for elderly patients with behavioral symptoms over the care range. A recent review found that overall the music therapy had moderate effects on anxiety and minor effects on depression and behavioral symptoms in people with dementia. However, bvFTD cases were not included in this study.60

The tailored activity program (TAP) is an occupational therapy intervention for individuals with dementia and their caregivers, developed in eight home sessions over a period of 3-4 months. It has proven to be an acceptable intervention for individuals with bvFTD and their families. The qualitative analysis identified five themes: benefits perceived by caregivers, willingness of caregivers to change, strategies used by caregivers to engage people with dementia, barriers to implement TAP, and engagement of people with dementia. The quantitative analysis revealed a significant reduction in behavioral symptoms and maintenance of functional performance at the end of a 4-month trial.61

Future perspectives and disease-modifying drugs

It is challenging to differentiate the various pathological conditions underpinning FTD, and the absence of reliable biomarkers has been a challenge in the search for disease-modifying drugs.62,63 Regardless, there is an increased understanding in the field, and there are ongoing clinical trials with drugs with potential disease-modifying effect. Currently, the main therapeutic targets are preventing tau aggregates (aggregation inhibitor, acetylation inhibitor, and immunotherapies for aggregates reduction); preventing tau loss of normal function; clearing the transactive DNA-binding protein 43 (TDP43) aggregates; preventing Fused in sarcoma, Ewing sarcoma, and TATA-box-binding associated factor 15 (FET)-protein family accumulation; raising or restoring progranulin levels; and suppressing the expression of harmful genes.62,63 Several of those potential disease-modifying therapies have been or are being tested in Phase II clinical trials. So far, there were negative outcomes of Phase III study of leuco-methyl thioninium, trx0237 (LMTM), a drug for the aggregation of tau protein.62,63

There are several approaches to treat bvFTD core symptoms, most of them based on low-quality research. There is no medication with specific therapeutic indication for bvFTD so far.

Treatments and neurotransmission disturbances in bvFTD are often investigated based on primary psychiatric disorders with similar symptoms, such as the compulsive behavior of obsessive-compulsive disorder or the agitation and psychotic symptoms of schizophrenic and bipolar disorders, and pharmacological treatment should be guided by the predominant symptoms profile. Thus, SSRIs and trazodone are medications that can be useful in the control of some behavioral symptoms such as disinhibition, persevering, stereotyped behaviors, and hyperorality. Nevertheless, apathy, a common symptom in bvFTD, does not usually respond to these medications, and psychostimulants could be an option in some cases. Antipsychotics should be avoided as the evidence is weak and the risks are high. There are non-pharmacological interventions, especially music therapy and training of family members and caregivers, which should be offered whenever possible. Clinical trials with drugs that have potential disease-modifying effects on FTD are still in progress. Moreover, promising therapies directed to monogenic forms of FTD are also under investigation.

Authors' contributions. LBG: conceptualization, investigation, methodology, writing - original draft, and writing - editing. HCG: supervision, writing - review & editing. LCS: supervision, writing - review & editing. PC: conceptualization, methodology, supervision, writing - review & editing.


REFERENCES

1. Clinical and neuropathological criteria for frontotemporal dementia. The Lund and Manchester Groups. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1994;57(4):416-8. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.57.4.416

2. Neary D, Snowden JS, Gustafson L, Passant U, Stuss D, Black S, et al. Frontotemporal lobar degeneration: a consensus on clinical diagnostic criteria. Neurology. 1998;51(6):1546-54. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.51.6.1546

3. Rascovsky K, Hodges JR, Knopman D, Mendez MF, Kramer JH, Neuhaus J, et al. Sensitivity of revised diagnostic criteria for the behavioural variant of frontotemporal dementia. Brain. 2011;134(Pt 9):2456-77. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awr179

4. Bahia VS, Takada LT, Deramecourt V. Neuropathology of frontotemporal lobar degeneration: a review. Dement Neuropsychol. 2013;7(1):19-26. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1980-57642013DN70100004

5. Onyike CU, Diehl-Schmid J. The epidemiology of frontotemporal dementia. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2013;25(2):130-7. https://doi.org/10.3109/09540261.2013.776523

6. Seo SW, Thibodeau MP, Perry DC, Hua A, Sidhu M, Sible I, et al. Early vs late age at onset frontotemporal dementia and frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Neurology. 2018;90(12):e1047-e56. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000005163

7. Seelaar H, Kamphorst W, Rosso SM, Azmani A, Masdjedi R, de Koning I, et al. Distinct genetic forms of frontotemporal dementia. Neurology. 2008;71(16):1220-6. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000319702.37497.72

8. Takada LT. The genetics of monogenic frontotemporal dementia. Dement Neuropsychol. 2015;9(3):219-29. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-57642015DN93000003

9. Kaizik C, Caga J, Camino J, O'Connor CM, McKinnon C, Oyebode JR, et al. Factors underpinning caregiver burden in frontotemporal dementia differ in spouses and their children. J Alzheimers Dis. 2017;56(3):1109-17. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-160852

10. Liljegren M, Naasan G, Temlett J, Perry DC, Rankin KP, Merrilees J, et al. Criminal behavior in frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer disease. JAMA Neurol. 2015;72(3):295-300. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2014.3781

11. Trieu C, Gossink F, Stek ML, Scheltens P, Pijnenburg YAL, Dols A. Effectiveness of pharmacological interventions for symptoms of behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia: a systematic review. Cogn Behav Neurol. 2020;33(1):1-15. https://doi.org/10.1097/WNN.0000000000000217

12. Moretti R, Torre P, Antonello RM, Cazzato G, Bava A. Frontotemporal dementia: paroxetine as a possible treatment of behavior symptoms. A randomized, controlled, open 14-month study. Eur Neurol. 2003;49(1):13-9. https://doi.org/10.1159/000067021

13. Deakin JB, Rahman S, Nestor PJ, Hodges JR, Sahakian BJ. Paroxetine does not improve symptoms and impairs cognition in frontotemporal dementia: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2004;172(4):400-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-003-1686-5

14. Lebert F, Stekke W, Hasenbroekx C, Pasquier F. Frontotemporal dementia: a randomised, controlled trial with trazodone. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2004;17(4):355-9. https://doi.org/10.1159/000077171

15. Rahman S, Robbins TW, Hodges JR, Mehta MA, Nestor PJ, Clark L, et al. Methylphenidate ('Ritalin') can ameliorate abnormal risk-taking behavior in the frontal variant of frontotemporal dementia. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2006;31(3):651-8. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.npp.1300886

16. Huey ED, Garcia C, Wassermann EM, Tierney MC, Grafman J. Stimulant treatment of frontotemporal dementia in 8 patients. J Clin Psychiatry. 2008;69(12):1981-2. https://doi.org/10.4088/jcp.v69n1219a

17. Kertesz A, Morlog D, Light M, Blair M, Davidson W, Jesso S, et al. Galantamine in frontotemporal dementia and primary progressive aphasia. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2008;25(2):178-85. https://doi.org/10.1159/000113034

18. Vercelletto M, Boutoleau-Bretonniere C, Volteau C, Puel M, Auriacombe S, Sarazin M, et al. Memantine in behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia: negative results. J Alzheimers Dis. 2011;23(4):749-59. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-2010-101632

19. Jesso S, Morlog D, Ross S, Pell MD, Pasternak SH, Mitchell DG, et al. The effects of oxytocin on social cognition and behaviour in frontotemporal dementia. Brain. 2011;134(Pt 9):2493-501. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awr171

20. Boxer AL, Knopman DS, Kaufer DI, Grossman M, Onyike C, Graf-Radford N, et al. Memantine in patients with frontotemporal lobar degeneration: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Neurol. 2013;12(2):149-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70320-4

21. Pardini M, Serrati C, Guida S, Mattei C, Abate L, Massucco D, et al. Souvenaid reduces behavioral deficits and improves social cognition skills in frontotemporal dementia: a proof-of-concept study. Neurodegener Dis. 2015;15(1):58-62. https://doi.org/10.1159/000369811

22. Callegari I, Mattei C, Benassi F, Krueger F, Grafman J, Yaldizli O, et al. Agomelatine improves apathy in frontotemporal dementia. Neurodegener Dis. 2016;16(5-6):352-6. https://doi.org/10.1159/000445873

23. Swartz JR, Miller BL, Lesser IM, Darby AL. Frontotemporal dementia: treatment response to serotonin selective reuptake inhibitors. J Clin Psychiatry. 1997;58(5):212-6. https://doi.org/10.4088/jcp.v58n0506

24. Adler G, Teufel M, Drach LM. Pharmacological treatment of frontotemporal dementia: treatment response to the MAO-A inhibitor moclobemide. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2003;18(7):653-5. https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.894

25. Ikeda M, Shigenobu K, Fukuhara R, Hokoishi K, Maki N, Nebu A, et al. Efficacy of fluvoxamine as a treatment for behavioral symptoms in frontotemporal lobar degeneration patients. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2004;17(3):117-21. https://doi.org/10.1159/000076343

26. Moretti R, Torre P, Antonello RM, Cattaruzza T, Cazzato G, Bava A. Rivastigmine in frontotemporal dementia: an open-label study. Drugs Aging. 2004;21(14):931-7. https://doi.org/10.2165/00002512-200421140-00003

27. Mendez MF, Shapira JS, Miller BL. Stereotypical movements and frontotemporal dementia. Mov Disord. 2005;20(6):742-5. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.20465

28. Diehl-Schmid J, Forstl H, Perneczky R, Pohl C, Kurz A. A 6-month, open-label study of memantine in patients with frontotemporal dementia. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2008;23(7):754-9. https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.1973

29. Boxer AL, Lipton AM, Womack K, Merrilees J, Neuhaus J, Pavlic D, et al. An open-label study of memantine treatment in 3 subtypes of frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2009;23(3):211-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/wad.0b013e318197852f

30. Herrmann N, Black SE, Chow T, Cappell J, Tang-Wai DF, Lanctot KL. Serotonergic function and treatment of behavioral and psychological symptoms of frontotemporal dementia. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2012;20(9):789-97. https://doi.org/10.1097/jgp.0b013e31823033f3

31. Moretti R, Torre P, Antonello RM, Cazzato G, Bava A. Effects of selegiline on fronto-temporal dementia: a neuropsychological evaluation. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2002;17(4):391-2. https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.602

32. Moretti R, Torre P, Antonello RM, Cazzato G, Griggio S, Bava A. Olanzapine as a treatment of neuropsychiatric disorders of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias: a 24-month follow-up of 68 patients. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2003;18(4):205-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/153331750301800410

33. Swanberg MM. Memantine for behavioral disturbances in frontotemporal dementia: a case series. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2007;21(2):164-6. https://doi.org/10.1097/wad.0b013e318047df5d

34. Mendez MF, Shapira JS, McMurtray A, Licht E. Preliminary findings: behavioral worsening on donepezil in patients with frontotemporal dementia. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2007;15(1):84-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.jgp.0000231744.69631.33

35. Czarnecki K, Kumar N, Josephs KA. Parkinsonism and tardive antecollis in frontotemporal dementia--increased sensitivity to newer antipsychotics? Eur J Neurol. 2008;15(2):199-201. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-1331.2007.02032.x

36. Curtis RC, Resch DS. Case of pick's central lobar atrophy with apparent stabilization of cognitive decline after treatment with risperidone. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2000;20(3):384-5. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004714-200006000-00018

37. Goforth HW, Konopka L, Primeau M, Ruth A, O'Donnell K, Patel R, et al. Quantitative electroencephalography in frontotemporal dementia with methylphenidate response: a case study. Clin EEG Neurosci. 2004;35(2):108-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/155005940403500212

38. Fellgiebel A, Muller MJ, Hiemke C, Bartenstein P, Schreckenberger M. Clinical improvement in a case of frontotemporal dementia under aripiprazole treatment corresponds to partial recovery of disturbed frontal glucose metabolism. World J Biol Psychiatry. 2007;8(2):123-6. https://doi.org/10.1080/15622970601016538

39. Cruz M, Marinho V, Fontenelle LF, Engelhardt E, Laks J. Topiramate may modulate alcohol abuse but not other compulsive behaviors in frontotemporal dementia: case report. Cogn Behav Neurol. 2008;21(2):104-6. https://doi.org/10.1097/wnn.0b013e31816bdf73

40. Poetter CE, Stewart JT. Treatment of indiscriminate, inappropriate sexual behavior in frontotemporal dementia with carbamazepine. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2012;32(1):137-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/jcp.0b013e31823f91b9

41. Singam C, Walterfang M, Mocellin R, Evans A, Velakoulis D. Topiramate for abnormal eating behaviour in frontotemporal dementia. Behav Neurol. 2013;27(3):285-6. https://doi.org/10.3233/BEN-120257

42. Huey ED, Putnam KT, Grafman J. A systematic review of neurotransmitter deficits and treatments in frontotemporal dementia. Neurology. 2006;66(1):17-22. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000191304.55196.4d

43. Manoochehri M, Huey ED. Diagnosis and management of behavioral issues in frontotemporal dementia. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2012;12(5):528-36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11910-012-0302-7

44. Bei H, Ross L, Neuhaus J, Knopman D, Kramer J, Boeve B, et al. Off-label medication use in frontotemporal dementia. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2010;25(2):128-33. https://doi.org/10.1177/1533317509356692

45. Lopez-Pousa S, Calvo-Perxas L, Lejarreta S, Cullell M, Melendez R, Hernandez E, et al. Use of antidementia drugs in frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2012;27(4):260-6. https://doi.org/10.1177/1533317512447887

46. Maher AR, Maglione M, Bagley S, Suttorp M, Hu JH, Ewing B, et al. Efficacy and comparative effectiveness of atypical antipsychotic medications for off-label uses in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2011;306(12):1359-69. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2011.1360

47. Dolder CR, Davis LN, McKinsey J. Use of psychostimulants in patients with dementia. Ann Pharmacother. 2010;44(10):1624-32. https://doi.org/10.1345/aph.1P341

48. Ruthirakuhan MT, Herrmann N, Abraham EH, Chan S, Lanctot KL. Pharmacological interventions for apathy in Alzheimer's disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;5:CD012197. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012197.pub2

49. Tsai RM, Boxer AL. Treatment of frontotemporal dementia. Curr Treat Options Neurol. 2014;16(11):319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11940-014-0319-0

50. Lanctôt KL, Herrmann N, Ganjavi H, Black SE, Rusjan PM, Houle S, et al. Serotonin-1A receptors in frontotemporal dementia compared with controls. Psychiatry Res. 2007;156(3):247-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pscychresns.2007.07.003.

51. Hughes LE, Rittman T, Regenthal R, Robbins TW, Rowe JB. Improving response inhibition systems in frontotemporal dementia with citalopram. Brain. 2015;138(Pt 7):1961-75. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awv133.

52. Franceschi M, Anchisi D, Pelati O, Zuffi M, Matarrese M, Moresco RM, et al. Glucose metabolism and serotonin receptors in the frontotemporal lobe degeneration. Ann Neurol. 2005;57(2):216-25. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.20365.

53. El Mansari M, Blier P. Mechanisms of action of current and potential pharmacotherapies of obsessive-compulsive disorder. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2006;30(3):362-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2005.11.005.

54. Piguet O, Petersen A, Yin Ka Lam B, Gabery S, Murphy K, Hodges JR, et al. Eating and hypothalamus changes in behavioral-variant frontotemporal dementia. Ann Neurol. 2011;69(2):312-9. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.22244

55. Thompson PJ, Baxendale SA, Duncan JS, Sander JW. Effects of topiramate on cognitive function. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2000;69(5):636-41. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.69.5.636.

56. Wilson C, Nomikos GG, Collu M, Fibiger HC. Dopaminergic correlates of motivated behavior: importance of drive. J Neurosci. 1995;15(7 Pt 2):5169-78. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.15-07-05169.1995.

57. Chong TT, Husain M. The role of dopamine in the pathophysiology and treatment of apathy. Prog Brain Res. 2016;229:389-426. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.pbr.2016.05.007.

58. Finger EC, MacKinley J, Blair M, Oliver LD, Jesso S, Tartaglia MC, et al. Oxytocin for frontotemporal dementia: a randomized dose-finding study of safety and tolerability. Neurology. 2015;84(2):174-81. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000001133

59. Ljubenkov PA, Miller BL. A clinical guide to frontotemporal dementias. Focus. 2016;14(4):448-64. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.focus.20160018

60. Legere LE, McNeill S, Schindel Martin L, Acorn M, An D. Nonpharmacological approaches for behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia in older adults: A systematic review of reviews. J Clin Nurs. 2018;27(7-8):e1360-e76. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14007

61. O'Connor CM, Clemson L, Brodaty H, Low LF, Jeon YH, Gitlin LN, et al. The tailored activity program (TAP) to address behavioral disturbances in frontotemporal dementia: a feasibility and pilot study. Disabil Rehabil. 2019;41(3):299-310. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2017.1387614

62. Logroscino G, Imbimbo BP, Lozupone M, Sardone R, Capozzo R, Battista P, et al. Promising therapies for the treatment of frontotemporal dementia clinical phenotypes: from symptomatic to disease-modifying drugs. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2019;20(9):1091-107. https://doi.org/10.1080/14656566.2019.1598377

63. Panza F, Lozupone M, Seripa D, Daniele A, Watling M, Giannelli G, et al. Development of disease-modifying drugs for frontotemporal dementia spectrum disorders. Nat Rev Neurol. 2020;16(4):213-28. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41582-020-0330-x










This study was conducted by the Behavioral and Cognitive Neurology Research Group, Departamento de Clínica Médica, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil

1. Behavioral and Cognitive Neurology Research Group, Departamento de Clínica Médica, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais - Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
2. Postgraduate Program in Neurosciences, Departamento de Clínica Médica, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais - Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil

Paulo Caramelli
Avenida Alfredo Balena, 190 / Sala 246 - Santa Efigênia
30130-100 Belo Horizonte MG - Brazil
E-mail: caramelli@ufmg.br

Received on December 11, 2020
Accepted in final form on March 25, 2021

Funding: none

Disclosure: The authors report no conflicts of interest

 

Home Contact