Vol. 13 nº 3 - Jul/Aug/Set de 2019
Original Article Pages 284 to 292
 

Executive function in systemic arterial hypertension: a systematic review
Função executiva na hipertensão arterial sistêmica: uma revisão sistemática

Authors: Natália Cristina Moraes1; Ivan Aprahamian2; Mônica Sanches Yassuda1

PDF

Descriptors: hypertension, executive functions, cognition, systematic review.
Descritores:
hipertensão, funções executivas, cognição, revisão sistemática.

ABSTRACT:
Systemic arterial hypertension (SAH) may be associated with worse cognitive performance, especially in tasks that evaluate the executive functions (EF).
OBJECTIVE: we aimed to review the evidence regarding which components of executive functions are most affected in adults with SAH.
METHODS: this systematic review used the PRISMA statement for searching Pubmed, Scielo and Lilacs databases with the keywords "executive function OR executive functioning AND hypertension".
RESULTS: EF tasks were divided into shifting, inhibitory control and updating. A total of 9 cross-sectional and 3 longitudinal studies were selected. Only 3 studies did not report worse performance among SAH patients on EF tasks when compared to normotensive controls. The measures of shifting and inhibitory control were the most frequently investigated and reported as altered among SAH individuals, assessed mainly by the Stroop Test and Trail-Making Test part B, respectively.
CONCLUSION: inhibitory control and shifting are the EF components most influenced by SAH. The results of this review may contribute to the devising of hypotheses about mechanisms underlying these cognitive impairments.

RESUMO:
A hipertensão arterial sistêmica (HAS) pode estar relacionada com pior desempenho cognitivo, principalmente em tarefas que avaliam as funções executivas (FE).
OBJETIVO: este artigo teve como objetivo revisar as evidências sobre quais componentes das FE são mais afetadas em adultos com HAS.
METÓDOS: esta revisão sistemática utilizou a metodologia PRISMA para buscas nas bases de dados Pubmed, Scielo e Lilacs com as palavras chaves "função executivas OU funcionamento executivo E hipertensão".
RESULTADOS: as tarefas foram divididas em alternância, controle inibitório e atualização. Foram selecionados 9 estudos transversais e 3 longitudinais. Apenas 3 estudos não relataram pior desempenho entre os pacientes com HAS em tarefa de FE quando comparados aos controles normotensos. As medidas de alternância e controle inibitório foram as mais frequentemente investigadas e relatadas como alteradas entre os indivíduos com HAS, avaliadas principalmente pelo Stroop Test e Teste de Trilhas parte B, respectivamente.
CONCLUSÃO: o controle inibitório e a alternância são os componentes da FE mais influenciados pela HAS. Os resultados desta revisão podem contribuir para a elaboração de hipóteses sobre mecanismos subjacentes a esses comprometimentos cognitivos.

Systemic arterial hypertension (SAH) is one of the most prevalent chronic diseases among adults, affecting around 600 million people in the Brazilian population.1 There are an estimated 7.1 million deaths annually from complications of this disease.1 Untreated SAH has negative consequences, such as the development of serious cardiovascular complications, including chronic renal failure, coronary artery disease (CAD), and stroke.2-4 More recently, researchers have examined the impact of SAH on cognition, especially on tasks associated with the concept of executive functions (EF).

The mechanisms by which SAH affects cognition are still not fully understood. In a recent paper, researchers reported that hypertension might alter the structure and function of cerebral blood vessels, leading to possible ischemic damage in regions of the white matter involved in cognitive processing.5 Other studies have suggested that the combination of advanced age and SAH fosters multifaceted interactions in pathophysiological pathways, leading, for example, to small vessel disease, altered regulation of blood flow and presence of signs of hyperintensity in the white matter.6 In addition, the relationship of SAH with increased cerebral vascular resistance and with diffuse lesions and multiple lacunar infarcts in the white matter is recognized, especially in the subcortical region.7,8 It is estimated that these brain changes can have a marked negative impact on performance of tasks associated with EF.

The concept of EF involves multiple important cognitive processes in regulating thoughts and behaviors.9-11 The term has been used to describe a number of skills that include various processing components such as: interrupting automatic and impulsive responses, starting tasks, resisting distractions and irrelevant interferences, switching between tasks, planning and monitoring intentional actions.9,11-13 Some theoretical models consider inhibition (inhibitory control), updating (working memory) and shifting or cognitive flexibility as the main domains of EF.11,14-17

Inhibitory control (IC) refers to the ability to deliberately inhibit dominant, automatic and impulsive responses or behaviors when necessary.11,18 Updating is closely linked to working memory and is responsible for constantly replacing some information with another during task performance.11,17 Finally, shifting involves the ability of performance control among different tasks, requiring rules to be maintained or disengaged, as needed.11,17,18

Some examples of tasks that evaluate the three main domains of EF are given in Table 1. It is important to note that cognitive tasks, in general, measure multiple domains of human cognition, but there is one domain that is understood as the central focus of the test.




Few studies have investigated the effect of SAH on different components of EF. Studies on the specific domains of EF affected by SAH may help identify the underlying mechanisms of impairment, given that components of EF may depend on different brain regions. For example, inhibitory control has been associated with frontal lobes, particularly the inferior frontal gyrus,24 while updating appears to recruit the basal ganglia.25 Shifting has been less examined in functional neuroimaging exams because it involves different parameters within the same task.17

Due to the scarcity of publications about the impact of SAH on the components of EF, the main objective of this study was to review the evidence regarding which components of executive functions are most affected in adults with SAH.


METHODS

This systematic review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Statement (www.prisma-statement.org). The electronic databases Pubmed, Lilacs and Scielo were searched with the following keywords: "executive function OR executive functioning AND hypertension". The searches were done between January 2017 and January 2019. A total of 319 studies were retrieved (Figure 1).


Figure 1. Literature search flow diagram.



The titles and abstracts were analyzed and a selection of articles was made according to the following inclusion criteria: a) involve one or more cognitive measures, at least one of them being EF; b) be available in Portuguese or English; c) include hypertension data with objective measures and not only self-report; d) comprise studies involving young, middle-aged and elderly adults. Exclusion criteria were: a) investigations whose primary objective was other diseases - e.g. diabetes, dementia, obesity, dyslipidemia; b) intervention studies; c) research in participants with stroke; d) surveys that included participants with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), cognitive impairment without dementia (CIND) or dementia; e) studies that included hypertensive subjects not treated with medications; f) case series studies, case reports, editorials and reviews. This selection yielded a total of 50 articles.

Finally, the articles were read in full and discussed with another researcher regarding inclusion and exclusion criteria for the final selection of studies. Twelve articles were selected to be included in the review, respecting inclusion and exclusion criteria.


RESULTS

There were 12 selected studies that investigated the relationship between SAH and EF, comprising nine cross-sectional and three longitudinal studies. Table 2 shows the studies characteristics, including sample profile, years of education, gender distribution, time with SAH diagnosis, follow-up time for longitudinal studies and countries of data collection.




Tables 3 and 4 show cross-sectional and longitudinal findings for the associations between SAH and EF, respectively. In these tables, information on EF components was included, according to the model described by Miyake et al. (2000) and Diamond (2013).






In cross-sectional studies, the TMT part B test was used for all studies, but not all of them had altered results. The Stroop Test was also used by most of the studies. These two tasks were the most affected in hypertensive subjects, suggesting that IC and shifting are the most affected domains in hypertensive subjects. Only two studies found no impairment of EF in hypertensive individuals.31,33

In longitudinal studies, the results were more heterogeneous. Two studies found significant differences in the cognitive trajectories over time of normotensive and hypertensive individuals in EF components35,36 and one found no differences.37 Follow-up time, sample size, age range, and subject´s education may account for the differences in the findings of these studies. Tables 5 and 6 summarize findings from cross-sectional and longitudinal studies, respectively, indicating the tasks most affected in the hypertensive groups.






Table 5 shows that the studies of Alipour and Goldust (2015)33 and Vicario et al. (2005)28 used the same tasks to analyze shifting (TMT part B) and IC (Stroop Test), but had discordant results. Alipour and Goldust (2015)33 evaluated 500 individuals with a mean age of 76.14±12.65 years using the MMSE (Mini-Mental State Examination), Digit Span, story recall, CLOX Test (Clock Drawing Test), TMT parts A and B, and the Phonemic Verbal Fluency test. The hypertensive group demonstrated significantly lower performance on the MMSE, story recall and the CLOX.

Giordano et al. (2012)31 investigated the relationship of the different components of BP (PP, DBP and SBP) with cognitive function in a sample of 288 subjects with a mean age of 73.5±10.1 years. The tests applied were the MMSE, Digit Span, story recall; TMT part B, Phonemic Verbal Fluency, CLOX, TMT part A and one test of overlapping figures. The hypertensive group had a significantly poorer performance on the MMSE, the immediate and delayed story recall, and the CLOX. SBP and PP were independent predictors of cognitive impairment.

The other six studies found significant differences between hypertensive and normotensive groups. Waldstein et al. (1996)26 examined the interaction between age and SAH as predictors of cognitive performance in a sample of 123 hypertensive patients, compared to 50 normotensive subjects. The protocol consisted of Ryan's Verbal Paired-Associative Learning Test, Logical Memory, Digit Span and Digit Symbol, Recurring Word test and Recurring Faces test, TMT parts A and B, Phonemic Verbal Fluency with initials F, A and S, Grooved Pegboard test, Finger Tapping Hand Test, Hand Dynamometer test, Maze Learning Test, Corsi Blocks, and the Stroop test. Young hypertensive participants had significantly lower performance on the Stroop Test, while the hypertensive and normotensive middle-aged subjects did not differ on this test. The young and middle-aged hypertensive participants presented more deficits than the normotensive subjects on the motor dexterity tests.

Kuo et al. (2004)27 analyzed the relationship between orthostatic BP decline and cognitive functions in a group of 70 elderly individuals aged 72.0±4.4 years with the Logical Memory, Visual Reproduction, TMT parts A and B and Verbal Fluency tests. Elevated BP was associated with impairment on the TMT part B where, for every 10 mmHg increase in SBP, there was a 2.31 fold increase in the risk of TMT part B impairment. The increase in SBP was not associated with the other measures.

Vicario et al. (2005)28 evaluated 60 hypertensive patients from a cardiology clinic with mean age of 71.5±4.2 years using the MMSE, TMT parts A and B, the New York University Paragraph Test, Stroop Test and Verbal Phonemic Fluency, and the alternating series test of drawing copy. The hypertensive group had lower performance on the paragraph recall, TMT part B and Stroop test.

Hannesdottir et al. (2009)29 evaluated the MMSE, a short form story of WASI, Digits of WAIS III Scale, Phonemic Verbal Fluency, TMT parts A and B, Logical Memory I and II among treated and untreated hypertensive subjects and healthy controls. Treated hypertensives performed significantly worse than controls on the immediate and late recall of the Logical Memory tests. Untreated hypertensive participants scored lower on the MMSE, Verbal Phonemic Fluency and TMT A and B, compared to controls.

Bucur and Madden (2010)30 recruited 134 hypertensive and normotensive individuals, evaluating them with the phonemic verbal fluency, TMT A and B, Stroop Test and a computerized version of the Symbol Digit. The z-scores of EF of the hypertensive group of older adults were significantly lower than those of the hypertensive younger adults.

Matoso et al. (2013)32 selected 45 participants, 17 normotensives and 28 hypertensives. The neuropsychological assessment consisted of the Cambridge Cognition-Revised (CAMCOG-R), TMT parts A and B, and the Auditory-Verbal Learning (RAVLT). The hypertensive group had lower performances on the CAMCOG-R, TMT A and B, and RAVLT total score.

Li et al. (2015)34 evaluated the cognitive performance of Chinese hypertensive individuals. Cognition was evaluated by the MMSE, RAVLT, Rey's complex figure, the ROCF copy test, TDR, Symbol Digit, Verbal Fluency, the Boston Naming Test, Stroop test, and TMT parts A and B. Hypertensive subjects had lower performance on memory tests (RAVLT), EF (Stroop and TMT part B) and MMSE compared to controls.

Yasar et al. (2011)35 examined whether elevated SBP or PP in elderly women was associated with changes in cognitive abilities at baseline and over a period of 9 years. The cognitive battery consisted of the MMSE, TMT parts A and B, immediate and late recall of the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R). In the cross-sectional analyses, the subjects of the HTN 1 group (SBP=140-159 mmHg) had a lower chance of impairment on the TMT part A compared to the control group. In the longitudinal analyses, the risk of cognitive impairment on any given test did not differ by SBP level. When participants were stratified according to age, subjects aged 76 to 80 years of the HTN 2 group (SBP ≥160 mmHg) had a five-fold increased risk of impairment on the TMT part B compared to the control group.

The study of Vicario et al. (2011),36 studying cognitive impairment in a cohort of hypertensive individuals, identifying affected domains and correlating cognitive performance with the measures of BP, recruited hypertensive subjects who were diagnosed at the age of 65 and followed up for six years. The neuropsychological evaluation was composed of the MMSE, New York University Paragraph Test to evaluate short and long-term episodic memory; TMT parts A and B, the CLOX and Stroop Test. The tests were administered at baseline and every 2 years of follow-up. Throughout the follow-up, short and long-term memory remained unchanged. However, there was a marked decline on the Stroop test and the TMT part B, with significant decline after the fourth year of follow-up.

Chen et al. (2015)37 examined the relationship between BP and cognition in middle-aged and elderly women. The study was based on data from 247 participants, whose BP was measured between 1992 and 2002. Cognitive assessment included the TMT part B, Symbol Digit Modalities Oral Test Version (SDMT), while Verbal Episodic Memory was evaluated using the Australian-modified California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT) and a 10-item supraspan word-list task. Analyses showed that normotensive women had better memory than those with pre-hypertension or hypertension. At follow-up, there was a significant difference between the two hypertensive groups in immediate episodic memory.


DISCUSSION

The objective of this review was to systematize research evidence about the possible impact of SAH on aspects of EF. Twelve articles were analyzed and, in most studies, shifting and IC proved to be the components of EF functioning that are impaired among hypertensive patients, usually measured by the TMT part B and the Stroop Test, respectively. Of the studies reviewed, 11 evaluated shifting (6 indicated impairment among hypertensive patients), 6 evaluated IC (5 indicated impairment) and 6 evaluated updating (2 indicated impairment). Thus, updating was the EF aspect with the least impairment.

Among the factors that may explain this result is the recruitment of the fronto-parietal network by several EF tasks.38,39 The activity of the frontal network is closely related to cerebral blood flow,40 and may be influenced by alterations in the vasculature present in hypertension which would contribute to executive dysfunction.41,42 Some studies43,44 have shown that the prefrontal region atrophies more readily in hypertensive subjects when compared to other regions of the brain and to the brain of normotensive individuals, suggesting that hypertension particularly impairs EF.

In addition to evaluating the cognitive performance of hypertensive patients, Li et al. (2015)34 investigated the neural mechanisms involved using functional magnetic resonance imaging and diffusion tensor imaging. Hypertensive patients had poorer performance in shifting and IC tasks than normotensive subjects besides abnormal patterns of activation in the left fronto-parietal network. Some studies have reported that these regions are more susceptible to the deleterious effects of hypertension,39,45 as there may be regional reduction of cerebral blood flow in this condition.45,46

In the cross-sectional study by Goldstein et al. (2013),47 about 50% of hypertensive patients were unable to complete the TMT part B, in addition to having more errors than normotensive subjects. Similar results were found for performance on the Stroop test. In the longitudinal study by Vicario et al. (2011),36 hypertensive patients showed progressive impairment in these two tests during follow-up. These data suggest that shifting and IC tests may indicate continued impairment in EF due to prolonged exposure to SAH.

It is known that cardiovascular diseases can alter cerebral blood flow, leading to microinfarction in the frontal lobes, with implications for EF.27 SAH has been recognized as representing a risk for the development of cerebrovascular diseases, which may be accompanied by macro and micro cerebral lesions.48 Two cohort studies indicated that SAH is an important risk factor for micro infarcts.49,50 The association between BP and micro infarcts was observed in subjects younger than 80 years old, and was restricted to higher SBP, but not DBP.49

The IC and shifting measures have been highlighted in this review as the most altered aspects of EF, whereas in the studies that evaluated updating, only two29,30 found impairment in this component among hypertensive patients. Updating, usually measured by Digit Span Backwards and Verbal Fluency, requires replacement and maintenance of information in working memory, as opposed to shifting tasks in which information is constantly updated (without partial maintenance).25 It is possible that specific working memory factors involved in updating (temporary data maintenance) tasks may require less executive processing and thus would be less vulnerable to the effects of SAH.17

Many EF tasks require monitoring of information relevant to the task objective and inhibiting irrelevant responses.51,52 For this reason, IC impacts the ability to maintain and manage goals and can influence the processing in progress on several tasks.53-55 This hypothesis could explain why five out of the six studies that included IC measurements indicated impaired results, pointing to poorer performance among hypertensive patients, as IC may represent a central aspect of EF.

There is evidence that executive functioning is the most impaired cognitive aspect in hypertensive subjects.55-61 However, most of these studies focused on only one or two of the EF components. The studies identified by this review revealed that IC and shifting are the components of EF most frequently impaired among hypertensive participants. Future studies should include in their protocols neuropsychological tests that evaluate the three aspects of EF of hypertensive patients, correlating them with level of disease severity, time since diagnosis and treatment.

Future studies should investigate in more depth the possible relationships among the EF components and how these may change in the presence of diseases such as SAH. In addition, further studies should investigate the impact of SAH-associated impairment in EF components in everyday life, assessing subtle changes in activities of daily living among individuals with hypertension.

Author contributions. All authors drafted and critically revised the manuscript.


REFERENCES

1. Ministério da Saúde. Vigitel Brasil 2016. Hábitos dos brasileiros impactam no crescimento da obesidade e aumenta prevalência de diabetes e hipertensão. http://portalarquivos.saude.gov.br/images/pdf/2017/abril/17/Vigitel.pdf

2. Egan BM, Zhao Y, Axon RN. US trends in Prevalence, Awareness, Treatment, and Control of Hypertension, 1988-2008. JAMA 2010;303(20): 2043-50.

3. Wolf-Maier K, Cooper RS, Banegas JR, Giampaoli S, Hense H-W, Joffres M, et al. Hypertension Prevalence and Blood Pressure Levels in 6 European Countries, Canada, and the United States. JAMA 2003; 289(18):2363-9.

4. Maule S, Caserta M, Bertello C, Verhovez A, Naso D, Bisbocci, Veglio F. Cognitive decline and low blood pressure: The other side of the coin. Clin Exp Hypertens. 2008;30:711-9.

5. Iadecola C, Yaffe K, Biller J, Bratzke LC, Faraci FM, Gorelick PB, et al. American Association Council on Hypertension; Council on Clinical Cardiology; Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young; Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing; Council on Quality of Care and Outcomes. Hypertension. 2016;68(6):67-e94.

6. Novak V, Hajjar Ihab. The relationship between blood pressure and cognitive function. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2010;7(12):686-98.

7. Patterson C, Feightner JW, Garcia A, Hsiung GY, MacKnight C, Sadovnick AD. Diagnosis and treatment of dementia: 1. Risk assessment and primary prevention of Alzheimer disease. CMAJ. 2008;178(5): 548-56.

8. Chertkow H. Diagnosis and treatment of dementia: Introduction. Introducing a series based on the Third Canadian Consensus Conference on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Dementia. CMAJ. 2008;178(3):316-21.

9. Diamond A. Executive functions. Ann Rev Psychol. 2013;64:135-68.

10. Moreira HS, Costa AS, Castro SL, Lima CF, Vicente SG. Assessing Executive Dysfunction in Neurodegenerative Disorders: A Critical Review of Brief Neuropsychological Tools. Front Aging Neurosci. 2017;9(9):369.

11. Miyake A, Friedman NP, Emerson MJ, Witzki AH, Howerter A, Wager TD. The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex "frontal lobe" tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cogn Psychol. 2000;41:49-100.

12. Banich MT. Executive function: The search for an integrated account. Curr Direct Psychol Sci. 2009;18:89-94.

13. Jurado MB, Rosselli M. The elusive nature of executive functions: A review a four current understanding. Neuropychol Rev. 2007;17:213-33.

14. Packwood S, Hodgets HM, Tremblay S. A multiperpective approach to the conceptualization of executive functions. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2011;33;4;456-70.

15. Ren X, Schweizer K, Xu F. The sources of the relationship between sustained attention and reasoning. Intelligence. 2013;41;51-8.

16. Wasserman T, Wasseman LD. Toward an integrated model of executive functioning in children. Appl Neuropsychol Child. 2013;2;2;1-9.

17. Friedman NP, Miyake A. Unity and diversity of executive functions: Individual differences as a window on cognitive structure. Cortex. 2017;86: 186-204.

18. Diamond A. The early development of executive functions. In: Bialystock E, Craik FIM (Eds.), Lifespan cognition: Mechanisms of change. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. 2006;70-95.

19. MacLeod CM. Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review. Psychol Bull.1991;109:163-203.

20. Nascimento E. Adaptação, validação e normatização do WAIS-III para uma amostra brasileira. In: Wescheler D. WAIS-III manual para administração e avaliação. São Paulo, Casa do Psicólogo; 2004.

21. Lezak MD, Howieson DB, Loring DW. Neuropsychological assessment (4th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press; 2004.

22. Arbuthnott K and Frank J. Trail Making Test, Part B as a Measure of Executive Control: Validation Using a Set-Switching Paradigm. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2000;22:518-28.

23. Stuss DT, Levine B, Alexander MP, Hong J, Palumbo C, Hamer L, et al. Wisconsin Card Sorting Test performance in patients with focal frontal and posterior brain damage: Effects of lesion location and test structure on separable cognitive processes. Neuropsychology. 2000;38:388-402.

24. Aron AR, Robbins TW, Poldrack RA. Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex: One decade on. Trends Cogn Sci. 2014;18:177-85.

25. Frank MJ, Loughry B, O'Reilley RC. Interactions between frontal cortex and basal ganglia in working memory: a computational model. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2001;1(2):137-60.

26. Waldstein SR, Jennings JR, Ryan C., Muldoon MF, Shapiro AP, Polefrone JM. Hypertension and neuropsychological performance in men: Interactive effects of age. Health Psychol 1996;15(2):102-9.

27. Kuo HK, Sorond F, Iloputaife I, Gangon M, Milberg W, Lipsitz LA. Effect of blood pressure on cognitive functions in elderly persons. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2004;59:1191-4.

28. Vicario A, Martinez CD, Baretto D, Diaz Casale A, Nicolosi L. Hypertension and cognitive decline: Impact on executive function. J Clin Hypertens. 2005;7(10):598-604.

29. Hannesdottir K, Nitkunan A, Charlton RA, Barrick TR, MacGregor GA, Markus HS. Cognitive Impairment and White Matter Damage in Hypertension: A Pilot Study. Acta Neurol Scand. 2009;119(4):261-8.

30. Buccur B, Madden DJ. Effects of Adult Age and Blood Pressure on Executive Function and Speed of Processing. Exp Aging Res, 2010; 36(2):153-68.

31. Giordano N, Tikhonoff V, Palatini P, Bascelli A, Boschetti G, Lazzari F, et al. Cognitive Functions and Cognitive Reserve in Relation to Blood Pressure Components in a Population-Based Cohort Aged 53 to 94 Years. Int J Hypertens. 2012;2012:274851.

32. Matoso JMD, Santos WB, Moreira IFH, Lourenço RA, Correia MLG. Idosos Hipertensos apresentam menor desempenho cognitive do que idosos normotensos. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2013;100(5):444-51.

33. Alipour H, Goldust M. The association between blood pressure components and cognitive functions and cognitive reserve. Clin Exp Hypertens. 2016;38:95-9.

34. Li X, Liang Y, Chen Y, Zhang J, Wei D, Chen K, et al. Disrupted Frontoparietal Network Mediates White Matter Structure Dysfunction Associated with Cognitive Decline in Hypertension Patients. J Neurosci. 2015;8;35(27):10015-24.

35. Yasar S, Ko JY, Nothelle S, Mieke MM, Carlson M. Evaluation of the effect of Systolic Blood Pressure and Pulse Pressure on Cognitive Function: The Women's Health and Aging Study II. Plos One 2011;(6):12;e27976.

36. Vicario A, Sueldo MD, Zilberman JM, Cerezo GH. Cognitive Evolution in Hypertensive Patients: a six-year follow-up. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2011;7:281-5.

37. Chen KHM, Hederson VW, Stolwyk RJ, Dennerstein L, Szoeke C. Prehypertension in midlife is associated with worse cognition a decade later in middle-aged and older women. Age and Aging. 2015;44:439-45.

38. Fedorenko E, Duncan J, Kanwisher N. Broad domain generality in focal regions of frontal and parietal cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013; 110(41):16616-21.

39. Niendam TA, Lair AR. Ray KL, Dean YM, Glahn DC, Carter CS. Metaanalytic evidence for a superordinate cognitive control network sub serving diverse executive functions. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2012; 12(2):241-68.

40. Brown SM, Manuck SB, Flory JD, Hariri AR. Neural basis of individual differences in impulsivity: contributions of corticolimbic circuits for behavioral arousal and control. Emotion. 2006;6:239-45.

41. Beason-Held IL, Moghekar A, Zonderman AB, Kraut MA, Resnick SM. Longitudinal changes in cerebral blood flow in the older hypertensive brain. Stroke. 2007;38(6):1766-73.

42. Dai W, Lopez OL, Carmichael OT, Becker JT, Kuller LH, Gach HM. Abnormal regional cerebral blood flow in cognitively normal elderly subjects with hypertension. Stroke. 2008;39(2):349-54.

43. Gianaros PJ, Greer PJ, Ryan CM, Jennings JR. Higher blood pressure predicts lower regional grey matter volume: Consequences on shortterm information processing. NeuroImage. 2006;31:754-65.

44. Raz N, Rodrigues KM, Acker JD. Hypertension and the brain: vulnerability of the prefrontal regions and executive functions. Behav Neurosci. 2003;117:1169-80.

45. Jennings JR, Muldoon MF, Ryan CM, Mintun MA, Meltzer CC, Townsend DW, Manuck SB. Cerebral blood flow in hypertensive patients: an initial report of reduced and compensatory blood flow responses during performance of two cognitive tasks. Hypertension. 1998;31:1216-22.

46. Gamalo MA, Ombao H, Jennings JR. Comparing extent of activation: a robust permutation approach. Neuroimage. 2005;24(3):715-22.

47. Goldstein FC, Levey AI, Steenland NK. High blood pressure and cognitive decline in mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2013;61(1): 67-73.

48. Smith E. Vascular Cognitive Impairment. Continuum (Minneap Min). 2016;22 (2):490-509.

49. Troncoso JC, Zonderman AB, Resnick SM, Crain B, Pletnikova O, O'Brien RJ. Effect of infarcts on dementia in the Baltimore longitudinal Study on aging. Ann Neurol. 2008;64:168-76.

50. Wang YR, Alexander GC, Stafford RS. Outpatient hypertension treatment, treatment intensification, and control in Western Europe and the United States. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(2):141-7.

51. Chatham CH, Yerys BE, Munakata Y. Why won't you do what I want? The informative failures of children and models. Cogn Dev. 2012;27(4): 349-66.

52. Hampshire A, Chamberlain SR, Monti MM, Duncan J, Owen AM. The role of the right inferior frontal gyrus: inhibition and attentional control. Neuroimage. 2010;50:1313-9.

53. Friedman NP, Miyake A, Young SE, Defries JC, Corley RP, Hewitt JK. Individual diferences in executive functions are almost entirely genetic in origin. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2008;137(2):201-25.

54. Gustavson DE, Miyake A, Hewitt JK, Friedman NP. Understanding the cognitive and genetic underpinnings of procrastination: Evidence for shared genetic influences with goal management and executive function abilities. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2015;144(6):1063-79.

55. Friedman NP, Miyake A. The nature and organization of individual diferences in executive functions: four general conclusions. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2012;21(1):8-14.

56. Yaffe K, Vittinghoff E, Pletcher MJ, Hoang TD, Launer LJ, Whitmer R, Coker LH, Sidney S. Early adult to midlife cardiovascular risk factors and cognitive function. Circulation. 2014;129:1560-7.

57. Gottesman RF, Schneider AL, Albert M, Alonso A, Bandeen-Roche K, Coker L, et al. Midlife hypertension and 20-year cognitive change: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities neurocognitive study. JAMA Neurol. 2014;71:1218-27.

58. Knopman D, Boland LL, Mosley T, Howard G, Liao D, Szklo M, et al. Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study Investigators Cardiovascular risk factors and cognitive decline in middle-aged adults. Neurology. 2001;56:42-8.

59. Köhler S, Baars MA, Spauwen P, Schievink S, Verhey FR, van Boxtel MJ. Temporal evolution of cognitive changes in incident hypertension: prospective cohort study across the adult age span. Hypertension. 2014;63:245-51.

60. Cerhan JR, Folsom AR, Mortimer JA, Shahar E, Knopman DS, McGovern PG, et al. Correlates of cognitive function in middle-aged adults: Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study Investigators. Gerontology. 1998;44:95-105.

61. Swan GE, Carmelli D, Larue A. Systolic blood pressure tracking over 25 to 30 years and cognitive performance in older adults. Stroke. 1998;29: 2334-40.

62. Rabinovici GD, Stephens ML. Possin KL. Executive Dysfunction. CONTINUUM: Lifelong Learning in Neurology. Behav Neurol Neuropsychiatry. 2015;21(3):646-59.

63. Shao Z, Janse E, Visser K, Meyer AS. What do verbal fluency tasks measure? Predictors of verbal fluency performance in older adults. Front Psychol. 2014;5:772.










1. Department of Neurology, University of São Paulo, SP, Brazil
2. Division of Geriatrics and Gerontology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine of Jundiaí, SP, Brazil

This study was conducted at the Department of Neurology, University of São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

Natália Cristina Moraes
Neurology Department / Faculty of Medicine of the University of São Paulo
Av. Dr. Enéas Carvalho de Aguiar, 155 - 05403-000 São Paulo SP - Brazil
E-mail: moraes.na@gmail.com

Received March 17, 2019
Accepted in final form July 01, 2019

Disclosure: The authors report no conflicts of interest.

 

Home Contact