Vol. 2 nº 2 - Apr/May/Jun de 2008
Original Article Pages 139 to 145
 

Cognitive rehabilitation of neuropsychological deficits and mild cognitive impairment: a review of the literature
Reabilitação cognitiva de déficits neuropsicológicos e transtorno cognitivo leve: revisão da literatura

Authors: Eliane Correa Miotto1, Valéria Trunkl Serrao2, Gláucia Benutte Guerra3, Mara Cristina Souza de Lúcia4, Milberto Scaff5

PDF

Descriptors: mild cognitive impairment, neuropsychological rehabilitation, cognitive training.
Descritores:
transtorno cognitivo leve, reabilitação neuropsicológica e treino cognitivo.

ABSTRACT:
Neuropsychological rehabilitation is related to the treatment or optimization of disabilities, handicaps and cognitive deficiencies including emotional, behavioral and personality alterations, aiming at the best cognitive, neurobiological and social re-adaptation. Objective: The main aim of this paper is to review scientific studies published over the last five years on cognitive training with rehabilitation, focusing on elderly subjects with cognitive complaints and patients diagnosed with MCI. Methods: Data were generated from Medline, PsychoInfo and EMBASE including publications from 2002 to 2007 using the search terms "Mild Cognitive Impairment", "Cognitive Complaints", "Rehabilitation" and "Intervention Studies". Data collection criteria were restricted to the quality of evidence Class I. Results: Eight articles out of sixty eight previously selected were chosen because of their randomized studies, including techniques of cognitive rehabilitation in patients with cognitive complaints, MCI and neuropsychological training. Conclusions: The studies showing generalization of rehabilitation techniques to practical real life situations and use of an errorless learning approach were considered more effective in terms of maintaining treatment follow up, although further studies are recommended.

RESUMO:
A reabilitação cognitiva se ocupa do tratamento e otimização das incapacidades, desvantagens e deficiências cognitivas, bem como de alterações emocionais, comportamentais e de personalidade. Visa a melhor readaptação neuropsicológica, neurobiológica e social. Objetivo: Realizar revisão literária sobre os estudos científicos publicados nos últimos cinco anos em reabilitação cognitiva, em sujeitos com queixas cognitivas e pacientes idosos diagnosticados com TCL. Métodos: As informações foram obtidas nas bases de dados Mediline, PsychoInfo e EMBASE com recomendações baseadas na qualidade de evidência Classe I. Resultados: Foram encontrados 68 artigos. Destes, selecionados oito, por caracterizarem estudos randomizados, incluir técnicas de reabilitação cognitiva em pacientes com queixas cognitivas e TCL e por documentarem avaliações neuropsicológicas. Conclusões: As pesquisas que demonstraram técnicas de reabilitação com abordagens capazes de generalização para as atividades práticas da vida e uso da abordagem aprendizagem sem erro se mostraram mais efetivas quanto à manutenção no seguimento, contudo, são necessários estudos mais detalhados.

Due to the growth in the elderly population over recent decades, an increase in the number of degenerative diseases including dementia has been documented. Consequently, an increasing number of non-pharmacological treatments aimed at cognitive improvement have emerged,1 particularly because these deficits are the first to appear, affecting memory, behavior alterations and loss of functional activities.2

Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI)3 has been widely studied in the international literature4 as a response to the aging global population. The international Working Group in Mild Cognitive Impairment5 recommends the assessment of complex instrumental activities and a variety of cognitive functions including memory, attention, executive functions, praxis, language and visuo-perception abilities for differential diagnosis. In particular, an objective memory impairment and/or other cognitive impairment must also be present to characterize MCI.6 This decline should be confirmed by the person, family, and by neuropsychological evaluation which enables cognitive alterations to be identified at a very early stage.

Several studies have reported that the earlier the identification of the MCI subtype and beginning of therapy, the better the results concerning the improvement in cognition.7,8 The clinical and pharmacological interests have grown because of the high possibility of the development of dementia. In an attempt to better understand this process9 some practical guidelines have been proposed by some studies.10

A Canadian study11 performed over a period of five years, showed that the prevalence of MCI varied between 1.03 to 3.02%, with the criteria of loss of memory or impaired daily activities not being used. There was an increase in the risk of death, institutionalization and development of dementia (mainly Alzheimer Disease - A.D.) at the end of follow up, demonstrating the importance of evaluating and monitoring patients with MCI.12 The annual conversion rate to A.D. was approximately 10 to 15%, representing an increased subgroup to develop this dementia syndrome, particularly those who presented MCI of multiple domains.13

Additional exams for diagnosis such as neuroimaging exams are not yet specific for A.D. and have not been validated in MCI detection. Discussions on this issue remain pertinent since the concept of MCI has only recently been and neuropathological data are limited.14

Since there is no cure or reversal of neurological deterioration caused by dementia, the available pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments try to minimize the speed of progression of the symptoms, especially those related to memory difficulties. Among non-pharmacological treatments, the rehabilitation of cognitive deficits or neuropsychological rehabilitation are highlighted.9,14-18

Most neuropsychological interventions include the treatment or adjustment of emotional and behavioral alterations in addition to cognitive, neurobiological and social readaptation.19 In this context, a broad comprehension of the concept and objectives of neuropsychological rehabilitation should include the following aspects:20 (1) rehabilitation conducted together with the patients with brain lesion, their family members and a multi-professional team; (2) before any rehabilitation program is started it is necessary to identify realistic goals of treatment; (3) the neuropsychological interventional programs should address the cognitive deficits, as well as the emotional and psychological problems; (4) the compensation of difficulties have been widely benefited by technological advance; (5) the rehabilitation treatment should go beyond the outpatient clinic or private consulting room and address real life difficulties in 'real environments'; (6) like any other area of study, neuropsychological rehabilitation needs a theoretical base that includes models and methods from different areas.

Over the past thirty years, the literature has described a number of memory rehabilitation techniques, including compensatory and restorative techniques. However, there are few neuropsychological techniques based on theoretical models. One such model, Goal Management Training (GMT) developed by Robertson (1996)21 was derived from theories of executive function particularly from Duncan's (1995)22 theory of goal neglect. In this technique, patients are trained to 'stop and think' about various problems and goals before and during the performance of a task. They are also trained to use a 'mental blackboard' or working memory to keep track of what they are doing and check if it matches their original goal.

Another technique, Errorless Learning (EL), prevents people from making mistakes when learning new information or a new skill. This procedure is based on the notion that without proper declarative memory that enables one to remember and then correct errors or learning through trial and error, error prevention should be adopted (Baddeley & Wilson, 1994).23 It has been suggested that errorless learning works through implicit memory, normally preserved in severe memory disorders and in amnesics. In cases of partial preservation of episodic memory, it works by strengthening explicit memory.

Recently, a number of studies have included computerized cognitive training (CCT) in their neuropsychological rehabilitation program aimed at stimulating specific cognitive functions such as memory, attention, language or executive functions. These computer programs include Smartbrain (www.educamigos.com), the Training Neuropsicológico di Mario (TNP) software24,25 used to stimulate specific cognitive functions26 and other programs still undergoing investigation.

Various studies using cognitive training focusing on memory, attention, language or executive deficits27 have suggested that it is possible to improve some of these cognitive deficits.28 However, only a few studies addressed the rehabilitation of these cognitive deficits in elderly patients with MCI and cognitive deficits. This article aimed to perform a literature review over the last five years on cognitive training in elderly patients with cognitive complaints or diagnosed with MCI.


Methods

The main databases used were Ovid-Medline, PsychINFO and EMBASE including publications from 2002 to 2007. The terms "MCI, Cognitive Deficits, Memory Complaint, Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, Cognitive Training and Cognitive Rehabilitation" were included as main descriptors, in Portuguese or English. The selected publications were restricted to the quality of evidence Class I - studies using randomized and controlled groups. Class II - non-randomized and non-controlled group studies and class III - case studies were not included.29 According to guidelines from the American Academy of Neurology, "Class I studies have a lower risk of bias than class II or III studies".29,30


Results

Amongst the 68 articles found, eight were selected and are characterized in Table 1. These are randomized controlled studies with techniques of cognitive rehabilitation in elderly subjects with memory complaints or MCI.




Levine et al.31 and Winocur et al.32 described the cognitive rehabilitation of elderly subjects with memory complaints over a period of twelve weeks. Focusing on a modular training program, two groups of elderly subjects (Group 1 N=29 and Group 2 N=20, average age 79 years, SD=2.4 years) with memory complaints received a neuropsychological rehabilitation program based on three modules. Three subjects were excluded due to technical reasons. The first module, named Memory Skills Training focused on how to use the external and internal strategies to learn, retain and retrieve the information including diaries and notes. The second, the Modified Goal Management Training - GMT33 trained subjects to plan and organize fictitious and real life activities breaking down complex tasks into small and simple steps while monitoring the outcome. The third, Psychosocial Training aimed at psychosocial well-being enhancing self-confidence and trust in their cognitive abilities. Each module lasted 4 weeks and the two groups of elderly subjects received the 3 modules in separate periods. The results indicated an improvement in real-life tasks and on a self-reported questionnaire (DEX) after the three-module program in both groups. There was also evidence of some generalization to practical situations. The limitation of these studies included the reduced sample, the need to better refine the program of training and adaptation of the protocol to address other cognitive deficits.31,32

Talassi et al. (2007)34 assessed the effectiveness of a structured cognitive rehabilitation program based on computer cognitive training of neuropsychological and behavioral difficulties and functional status in a group of elderly subjects with MCI (N=30) and mild dementia (MD, N=24). This program was compared to a control condition where subjects received physical rehabilitation, occupational therapy and behavioral training. The experimental cognitive rehabilitation program consisted of three activities: computerized cognitive training (CCT), occupational therapy (OT) and behavioral training (BT). The CCT used the TNP software24,25 to stimulate each cognitive function addressing groups of exercises; the OT stimulated the patients to reproduce or simulate basic activities of daily living and the BT treated mood disorders with behavioral therapy. The control group received either physical rehabilitation (PR), OT or BT. Each group had a 30-40 minute session held for every activity, 4-days a week for a 3-week period. The results indicated that systematic rehabilitation with the computer training program showed an improvement in constructive apraxia, visuospatial recall, functional status and mood in the MCI group. The group with MD also showed an improvement on global cognitive function assessed by the MMSE and mood. The control group showed no significant improvement.

Cipriani et al.26 investigated the outcome of a computer-based cognitive training program in patients with MCI (N=10), Alzheimer's disease (AD, N=10) and multiple system atrophy (MSA, N=3). Each patient attended two training programs with an interval of 4-8 weeks. The sessions lasted for 13-45 minutes over 4 days per week during a 4-week-period. The computer program was the same as mentioned in the previous study by Talassi et al.34 They used a modified version of the NPT software which aimed to stimulate attention, memory, perception, visuospatial abilities, language and non-verbal intelligence. Patients were assessed before and after 3 months at the end of the second training program. The MCI group improved on memory test score and the AD group improved on verbal fluency, executive functions and on MMSE scores. The MSA group did not show any changes in scores before and after treatment. The data from this research suggest that TNP can be used in specific groups of patients with memory impairment although no generalization effects were described.

Akhtar et al.35 adopted the "Errorless learning"- EL approach, i.e. learning without making mistakes, in patients with MCI (N=16). The results indicated that this technique was an effective tool showing significant improvements in the recall of a list of words in comparison to Errorful learning (EF). An important aspect considered in this study was the fact that in the group with memory impairment, the rehabilitation allowed for effective learning of new information by deploying this paradigm (EL).

Ball et al. (2007)36 combined data from six studies using a specified protocol of speed of processing training in order to evaluate training gains. The six studies included 2,039 elderly subjects (mean age=73.94, SD=5.96) with or without speed of processing deficits and all of them investigated the impact of completion of a computerized speed of processing training protocol on the cognitive and everyday abilities of older adults. The results suggested that training produced immediate improvements across all subtests and performance on instrumental activities and driving especially in those with speed of processing deficits. In addition, age and education had little to no impact on training gains and the participants maintained these gains for at least 2 years.

In another study, Ball et al. (2002)37 investigated whether cognitive training interventions improved mental abilities and daily functioning in elderly, independent-living adults with memory complaints. The 2832 participants aged 65 to 94 years' old and were recruited from six metropolitan areas in the United States. Each intervention improved the targeted cognitive ability compared with baseline over two years. Three distinct cognitive interventions were used: memory, reasoning and speed training. Participants received instructions regarding strategies or mnemonic rule, and individual exercises or group feedback about their performance. They were trained to organize word lists with images and mental associations in order to recall them. The exercises involved laboratory memory tasks (e.g. recalling a list of nouns) as well as memory tasks related to cognitive activities of everyday life (e.g. remembering a shopping list). Reasoning training focused on the ability to solve problems in a serial pattern. Speed-of-processing training focused on visual search skills and ability to identify and locate visual information quickly in a divided-attention format. The results suggested that the cognitive training interventions improved targeted cognitive abilities in an effective way. However, no training effects on everyday functioning were detected after two years.

Subjects diagnosed with MCI who were submitted to neuropsychological training associated to cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEIs),38 achieved in the long term, cognitive improvement in memory, abstract reasoning and humor. It was evident that the combined treatment produced potencializing effects in the reduction of memory deterioration and in the delay of conversion from MCI to AD. Since there was no longer-term follow-up in this study, it was not possible to observe the presence of deterioration or whether the effect of improvement was associated with the training or resulted from a possible synergy between the cholinesterase inhibitors and neuropsychological training.


Discussion

The aim of this study was to review the benefits of cognitive rehabilitation techniques in patients with cognitive complaints and MCI.

Cognitive training has been based on theories that support the use of specific techniques in order to optimize cognitive functioning (e.g. mnemonic techniques) in individuals with cognitive impairments and MCI, and to slow the rate of cognitive decline and handicap in daily life activities.

The main findings of the studies included in this review suggest that neuropsychological rehabilitation is recommended for patients with cognitive complaints, MCI and pre-clinical dementia which employ the Errorless Learning strategy.

Clare et al.39,40 suggested that awareness by the participants in terms of their potential and limitations leads to significant benefits from the rehabilitation techniques.

Another issue raised by the studies is the fact that programs of cognitive rehabilitation do not necessarily provide generalization from a controlled environment into everyday life situations. Even if there were transfer of the beneficial effects to daily activities, these would be restricted to a limited number of tasks. There are only few Class I studies in the literature on cognitive rehabilitation of these subjects and one of the reasons is the fact that there are few techniques including computerized training programs available, and also because this is a relatively new area in comparison to the rehabilitation of patients with AD.

Nevertheless, the implementation of rehabilitation programs with this population should be based on knowledge of the disease process, identifying the preserved and impaired abilities and handicaps. Knowledge of the most appropriate techniques to be applied for specific difficulties is also key, as is focusing on an errorless learning approach and always considering the carers as an integral part of the treatment receiving information and emotional support. It is also necessary to identify the consequences of cognitive impairment to daily life activities, since the goal of neuropsychological rehabilitation is not an improvement in the performance of cognitive tests but rather an improvement in quality of life of the patients, family members and caregivers.


References

1. IBGE: Estimativas anuais e mensais da população do Brasil e das unidades da federação: 1980-2020. Metodologias Estimativas das populações municipais. Acessado em 28/11/2007. http://www.ibge.gov.br/brasil_em_sintese/default.htm.

2. Ávila R, Miotto E. Reabilitação Neuropsicológica de déficits de memória em pacientes com demência de Alzheimer. Rev Psiq Clin 2002;29:190-196.

3. Petersen RC, Smith GE, Waring SC, et al. Mild cognitive impairment: Clinical characterization and outcome. Arch Neurol 1999;56:303-308.

4. Petersen RC, Doody R, Kurz A, et al. Current concepts in mild cognitive impairment. Arch Neurol 2001;58:1985-1992.

5. Petersen, RC. Mild cognitive impairment as a diagnostic entity. J Intern Med 2004; 256:183-194.

6. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 4th Ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 1994.

7. De Vreese LP, Neri M, Fioravanti M, BelL OI, Zanetti O. Memory rehabilitation in Alzheimer's: a Review of Progress. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2001;16:794-809.

8. Larrieu S, Letenneur L, Orgogozo JM, et al. Incidence and outcome of mild cognitive impairment in a population-based prospective cohort. Neurology 2002;59:1594-1599.

9. Belleville S. Cognitive training for persons with mild cognitive impairment - MCI Conference Paper. Int Psychogeriatr 2008;20:57-66.

10. Artero S, Ritchie K. The detection of Mild Cognitive Impairment in the general practice setting. Aging Ment Health, 2003;7:251-258.

11. Fisk JD, Merry HR, Rockwood K. Variations in case definition affect prevalence but not outcomes of mild cognitive impairment. Neurology 2003;61:1179-1184.

12. Bottino CMC, Moreno MDPQ. Comprometimento cognitivo leve: Critérios diagnósticos e validade clínica. In: Bottino CMC, Laks J, Blay SL, editores. Demência e transtornos cognitivos em idosos. Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara Koogan; 2006.

13. Morris LC, Storandt M, Miller JP, et al. Mild cognitive impairment represents early-stage Alzheimer disease. Arch Neurol 2001;58:397-405.

14. Boyle PA, Wilson RS, Aggarwal NT, Tang Y, Bennett DA. Mild cognitive impairment: Risk of Alzheimer disease and rate of cognitive decline. Neurology 2006;67: 441-445.

15. Pérès K, Chrysostome V, Fabrigoule C, Orgogozo JM, Dartigues JF, Barberger-Gateau P. Restriction in complex activities of daily living in MCI - Impact on outcome. Neurology 2006;67:461-466.

16. Belleville S, Gilbert B, Fontaine F, Gagnon L, Ménard É, Gauthier S. Improvement of episodic memory in persons with mild cognitive impairment and healthy adults: evidence from a cognitive intervention program. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2006;22:486-499.

17. Perrotin A, Belleville S, Isingrini M. Metamemory monitoring in mild cognitive impairment: Evidence of a less accurate episodic feeling-of-knowing. Neuropsychologia 2007;45:2811-2826.

18. Portet F, Ousset PJ, Visser PJ, et al. Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) in medical practice: a critical review of the concept and new diagnostic procedure. Report of the MCI Working Group of the European Consortium on Alzheimer's Disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2006;77:714-718.

19. Wilson BA. Reabilitação das Deficiências Cognitivas, In: Nitrini R, Caramelli P, Mansur LL, editores. Neuropsicologia das Bases Anatômicas à Reabilitação. São Paulo, Clínica Neurológica HC-FMUSP; 1996.

20. Wilson BA. Avanços recentes em reabilitação neuropsicológica. In: Miotto EC, Lúcia MCS, Scaff M, editores. Neuropsicologia e as Interfaces com as Neurociências - São Paulo: Casa do Psicólogo; 2007.

21. Robertson I.H. Goal Management training: A clinical manual. Cambridge, UK: PsyConsult; 1996.

22. Duncan J. Attention, Intelligence, and the frontal lobes, In: Gazzaniga MS, editor. The cognitive neurosciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT press; 1995.

23. Baddeley AD, Wilson BA. When implicit learning fails: amnesia and the problem of error elimination. Neuropsychologia 1994;32: 53-68.

24. Tonetta M. II TNP, un software che opera in ambiente Windows. Atti del 4 Convegno Nazionale Informatica, Didattic e Disabilità. Napoli, (in Italian); 1995.

25. Tonetta M. Riabilitazione neuropsicológica e TNP (training neuropsicológico). Aspetti teorici e pragmatici. New Magazine Publisher, Trento (in Italian); 1998.

26. Cipriani G, Bianchetti A, Trabucchi M. Outcomes of a computer-based cognitive rehabilitation program on Alzheimer's disease patients compared with those on patients affected by mild cognitive impairment. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2006;43:327-335.

27. Ala TA, Berck G, Popovich AM. Using the telephone to call for help and caregiver awareness in Alzheimer disease. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 2005;19:79-84.

28. Salloway S, Correia S, Richardson S. Key lessons learned from short-term treatment trials of cholinesterase inhibitors for amnestic MCI. Int Psychogeriatr 2008;20:40-46.

29. American Academy of Neurology - Clinical Practice Guideline Process Manual. Approved by the AAN Board of Directors January, 2004.

30. Brainin A, Barnes M, Baron JC, et al. Guidance for the preparation of neurological management guidelines by EFNS scientific task forces - revised recommendations 2004. Eur J Neurol 2004;11:577-581.

31. Levine B, Stuss DT, Winocur W, et al. Cognitive rehabilitation in the elderly: Effects on strategic behavior in relation to goal management. J Int Neuropsychol Society 2007;13:143-152.

32. Winocur G, Craik FIM, Levine B, et al. Cognitive rehabilitation in the elderly: Overview and future directions. J Int Neuropsychol Society 2007;13:166-171.

33. Levine B, Robertson IH, Clare L, et al. Rehabilitation of executive functioning: An experimental-clinical validation of Goal Management Training. J Int Neuropsychol Society 2000;6:299-312.

34. Talassi E, Guerrecshi M, Feriani M, Fedi V, Bianchetti A, Trabucci M. Effectiveness of a cognitive rehabilitation program in mild dementia (MD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI): a case control study. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2007;44(Suppl 1):391-399.

35. Akhtar S, Moulin CJA, Bowie PCW. Are people with mild cognitive impairment aware of the benefits of errorless learning? Neuropsychol Rehabil 2006;16:329-346.

36. Ball K, Edwards JD, Ross LA. The impact of speed of processing training on cognitive and everyday functions. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2007; 62B:19-31.

37. Ball K, Berch DB, Helmers KF, et al. Effects of cognitive training interventions with older adults: A randomized controlled trial. J Am Med Assoc 2002;288:2271-2281.

38. Rozzini L, Costardi D, Chilovi VB, Franzoni S, Trabucchi M, Padovani A. Efficacy of cognitive rehabilitation in patients with mild cognitive impairment treated with cholinesterase inhibitors. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2007;22:356-360.

39. Clare L, Woods RT. Cognitive training and cognitive rehabilitation for people with early-stage Alzheimer's disease: A review. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2004;14:385-401.

40. Clare L, Marková I, Verhey F, Kenny G. Awareness in dementia: A review of assessment methods and measures. Aging Ment Health, 2005;9:394-413.








1 Clinical Director of the Division of Psychology, Hospital das Clinicas, University of São Paulo, Brazil. 2 Post-Graduate Student in Clinical Neuropsychology, Hospital das Clinicas, University of São Paulo, Brazil.
3 Research Director of the Division of Psychology, Hospital das Clinicas, University of São Paulo, Brazil.
4 Director of the Psychology Division, Hospital das Clínicas, University of São Paulo, Brazil;
5 Professor of the Neurology Department, Hospital das Clínicas, University of São Paulo, Brazil.

Eliane Correa Miotto - Division of Psychology and Department of Neurology / Hospital das Clinicas / University of Sao Paulo - Av. Dr Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar, 155 - 05403-000 São Paulo SP - Brazil. E-mail: ecmiotto@usp.br

Received March 24, 2008. Accepted in final form May 20, 2008.

 

Home Contact