Vol. 2 nº 2 - Apr/May/Jun de 2008
Original Article Pages 82 to 90
 

Subcortical ischemic vascular disease and cognition: a systematic review
Doença vascular isquêmica subcortical e cognição: uma revisão sistemática

Authors: Gilberto Sousa Alves1, Carlos Eduardo de Oliveira Alves1, Maria Elisa Lanna1, Denise Madeira Moreira2,3, Eliasz Engelhardt2, Jerson Laks1,4

PDF

Descriptors: neuropsychology, vascular dementia, cerebrovascular disorders, cognition.
Descritores:
neuropsicologia, demência vascular, doença cerebrovascular, cognição.

ABSTRACT:
Subcortical Ischemic Vascular Disease (SIVD) is underdiagnosed. This review investigates the relationship among SIVD severity, cognitive status and neuroimaging markers. Methods: Cohort, cross-sectional and case control studies were searched on ISI, Medline, Scielo, PsychoInfo and LILACS databases published between 1995 and 2006. Results: The most impaired cognitive domains were executive, attentional and memory retrieval mechanisms. These cognitive features were frequently associated to White Matter Lesions (WML). Conclusions: WML is an independent factor in cognitive decline. However, the threshold for this impact is not yet clearly established.

RESUMO:
A doença vascular isquêmica subcortical (DVIS) é uma condição ainda subdiagnosticada. Esta revisão investiga a relação entre a gravidade da DVIS, o status cognitivo e marcadores de neuroimagem. Métodos: Estudos de coorte, seccionais e casos-controles foram pesquisados nas bases de dados ISI, Medline, Scielo, PsychoInfo e LILACS entre 1995 e 2006. Resultados: Os domínios cognitivos mais comprometidos foram as funções executivas, a atenção e a recuperação da memória. Estes achados cognitivos estiveram frequentemente associados à presença de lesões em substância branca (LSB). Conclusões: As LSB constituem um fator de risco independente para o declínio cognitivo. Contudo, o limiar de impacto desta variável ainda não pôde ser claramente estabelecido.

Elderly subjects commonly present with some degree of cerebrovascular lesion on brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI).1,2 Depending on the site, intensity and severity, these lesions may either cause or contribute to further cognitive decline. Among the overall category of cerebrovascular disease (CVD), subcortical ischemic vascular disease (SIVD) is particularly prevalent3,4 and encompasses three basic pathological entities: small vessel disease, lacunar infarct and ischemic white matter lesions (WML). This categorization is depicted according to the primary type of brain lesions.5

Being a homogeneous construct, the diagnosis of SIVD allows better knowledge of the clinical picture as well as of the natural history, outcome and clinical response to treatment strategies.5-8 Regardless of the causal pathological factor of brain vascular lesions, a wide variety of complex mechanisms can be singled out as risk and intervening factors for SIVD. These factors include interactions between vascular etiologies (hypoperfusion caused by arterial stiffness and its relationship to risk factors such as arterial hypertension), microvascular changes in the brain (infarcts, WML, atrophy), host factors (age, education), hypotension, genetic inheritance (CADASIL), and cognitive characteristics.5,9

The main clinical manifestations of SIVD may be summarized as a "dysexecutive syndrome" due to the interruption of prefrontal-subcortical loops10,11 affecting control, volition, planning, programming, anticipation, inhibition of inappropriate behaviors, and monitoring of complex goal-directed activities.12,13 The clinical picture also includes psychomotor slowness, forgetfulness, and changes in speech, affect and mood11,14. Despite the fact that dysexecutive syndrome and cognitive decline are frequently observed in SIVD, a debate remains over to what extent the vascular lesions have to be present in order to be responsible for the clinical and neuropsychological picture.15 This review aimed to investigate the relationship between SIVD severity and cognitive status with possible neuroimaging markers, addressing two main questions: (1) how the clinical stage of subcortical disease is related to impairment in specific cognitive domains and how it affects prognosis and functional status; (2) the impact of the presence, localization and extent of WML on cognition.


Methods

A systematic review of the literature regarding SIVD was performed by searching data from ISI, Medline, Scielo, PsychoInfo, and LILACS web databases published between 1995 (January) and 2006 (July). The search strategy included key words aimed at investigating a broader spectrum of primary vascular disorders affecting subcortical areas, mainly white-matter lesions: subcortical disease OR dementia, vascular dementia, small vessels disease, Binswanger disease, CADASIL, white-matter disease OR dementia, leukoencephalopathy, cerebrovascular disease or disorders, brain vascular disease OR disorder.

All abstracts were independently read by five authors (GSA; EE; CEOA; MEL; JL) and those studies which complied with the inclusion criteria were selected for further reading. A manual search was also performed to reach articles related to this subject found among the references of the selected studies. The articles which satisfied all the following criteria were included for further reading and analysis. They had (1) to be cohort, cross-sectional, or case control studies with at least one criterion for vascular dementia (DSM-IV, or NINDS-AIREN, or ICD-10, or ADDTC); (2) to provide data on cognitively impaired patients >60 years of age, with or without clinical diagnosis of dementia; (3) to include a comprehensive neuropsychological assessment, as well as at least one neuroimaging exam (brain Computed Tomography or Magnetic Resonance). Studies that described reviews of the literature, case reports, samples with primary psychiatric disorders, exclusively cortical lesions (Alzheimer disease or cortical vascular disease), gray-matter, and cerebellar diseases were excluded from this review. The following items were chosen to describe the correlated variables: 1) methodological characteristics concerning the article; 2) cognitive outcomes and subcortical disease; 3) neuroradiologic findings and cognitive-functional aspects.

To the best of our knowledge, only one other systematic review on the subject has sought to study the relationship between WML and cognition.16


Results

This search retrieved a total of 159 articles, only 32 of which remained eligible according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. A further analysis excluded three other papers, two because the majority of individuals in the sample were younger than 60 years and one because of absence of neuroimaging to ascertain the presence of SIVD. Tables 1 and 2 show the 29 articles included in this study, displaying two subgroups: firstly those that only studied the cognitive profile (Table 1), plus the studies that assessed the correlations with neuroimaging (Table 2).







Methodological characteristics of the articles

Twenty-four studies were cross-sectional and five longitudinal. The samples assessed in the articles were predominantly outpatients (18), followed by inpatients (6 articles) and mixed samples (inpatients/outpatients) in one article.17 Seven articles involved samples from branches of multi-center projects. Three studies consisted of population based individuals,15,18-19 whereas four articles were from a study involving outpatients.20-23 One article did not describe the source of the patients.24

Cognitive manifestations and subcortical disease

The majority of the articles (n=28, 96.5 %) found a correlation between the clinical diagnosis of SIVD and cognitive alterations. The present analysis focused on executive dysfunction and is complemented by data on other cognitive domains.

Executive dysfunction

A worse performance in executive functions was the main finding of the studies comparing SIVD patients with other causes of dementia, such as cortical stroke patients,25,26 lacunar infarcts27 and AD.22

Executive dysfunction was considered a predictor of worse performance in complex activities of daily life in one study.28 In the Libon et al.22 study, the SIVD group presented greater impairment in the executive control tests, such as the Boston Revision of the Wechsler Memory Scale-Mental Control Subtest (WMS-MC),29 in relation to AD patients. Impairment in tasks assessing the set shifting process was described in some studies, whether comparing SIVD to healthy controls30 or to other groups of patients such as fronto temporal dementia21. Worse performance in mental flexibility tasks (Wisconsin Card Sorting Test), together with a lack of response inhibition (Stroop Test) was also seen in a recent article.25 In the work by O'Sullivan et al.,30 a brief assessment of executive functions involving Trail Making and digit symbols was able to provide good sensitivity and specificity for distinguishing individuals with ischemic leukoaraiosis from subjects with healthy aging.

Impairment of executive functioning at early stages of the disease was investigated in two studies using outpatient samples diagnosed with CADASIL (autosomal dominant arteriopathy associated with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy). One of these31 evaluated three distinct clinical groups - patients with no previous history of cerebral infarct and two groups with recent stroke, with and without vascular dementia (VD). Using MRI, the authors observed impairment in executive functions in the group with mild radiological alterations of white matter. In the other article,32 impaired performance in executive tasks, evidenced by a greater proportion of perseverative errors, was shown in the group with vascular cognitive impairment (VCI). Accordingly, these findings should enhance the differential diagnosis between vascular and neurodegenerative diseases, since CADASIL has a clinical presentation with frontal executive impairment at very early stages.

Cognitive performance other than executive

Attentional deficits were also a frequently reported finding15,21,24,33-36 and were strongly correlated to subcortical lesions. Lower scores in attention and concentration tests were seen in vascular groups compared to AD34 or healthy controls.33 Slowing in processing speed, assessed by the Trail Making Test,30,32-33 Block Design17 and Letter-Digit substitution test15 was more associated to subcortical disease.

Distinct mechanisms of memory impairment differentiated AD from SIVD. SIVD patients tended to show better performance than the AD group on delayed recognition memory with or without the help of clues.22-23,34,37 Also, the SIVD group performed better than patients with AD in delayed recall tasks,34 as wells as selective and divided attention tasks,38 and in relation to the number of intrusive errors, cued recall memory retrieval and visual recognition tests.22

Impairment of higher cognitive skills was discussed in addition to executive, memory and attention abnormalities. Visuo-spatial and visuo-construction abilities were assessed by specific tasks, such as the Block Design and Clock Drawing Test and were found to be more impaired in SIVD than in AD20,34,39 and healthy controls.17,31 One of the studies observed greater impairment of such domains in mild stages of VaD.34 Language deficits, described as semantic and phonological abnormalities, were seen in the vascular group in a two-year follow-up study.20 The accuracy of verbal fluency (equal to 0.75 under the area of the Receiver Operating characteristic Curve, with a confidence interval of 95%) was considered by another study36 as one of the best parameters to discriminate individuals with amnestic complaints from those with mild subcortical disease. Another article observed a double dissociation between AD and the SIVD group, with the latter showing a worse performance in verbal fluency and better scores in verbal recognition.37

Neuroimaging and cognitive aspects

Seventeen studies analyzed the association between WML and cognitive features. Sixteen of these articles (94.1%) found a relationship among neuroimaging, cognition and subcortical disease. The main findings are summarized under the topics below.

Presence of WML and cognitive performance in healthy individuals

Two studies described an association between WML and the presence of cognitive deficits in samples without a clinical diagnosis of dementia. One of these evaluated oldest old patients (aged >85 years) and observed an association between microangiopathy lesions and cognitive decline.17 Another article found a worse cognitive performance (measured by ADAS-cog) and a greater intensity of small infarcts in a non-demented group (with Clinical Dementia Rating . CDR 0), in comparison with healthy individuals without radiological alterations.28

The presence of WML and cognitive alterations

There seems to be an association between the attention and executive function tests and the presence of subcortical hyperintensities (SHI) in MRI, although the degree of global cortical atrophy was not related to the occurrence of SHI.33 Different studies found similar associations between the presence of subcortical lesions and impaired speed of thought and specific psychomotor skills. A decrease in cognitive processing speed was associated with the presence of WML17 and hyperintensities in MRI.24 The presence of WML was also associated with lower scores in visuo-constructional,39 visuo-motor (Block Design), and visuo-spatial skills (Clock-Drawing Test),17 attention and concentration24,33 and the severity of the microangiopathic lesions correlated to decreased learning of motor skills.23

Interestingly, other cognitive domains were not associated with subcortical lesions. For instance, a greater intensity of WML neither correlated with a more serious impairment of memory and language39 nor to global cognitive scores measured by the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale (MDRS).27 Two outpatient studies40-41 observed no correlation between the severity of WML and performance in neuropsychological tests.

Localization and extent of WMLs and cognitive alterations

Six studies15,18-19,23,42-43 directly analyzed the correlation between the presence and extension of WML and global cognitive performance and specific functions, with different findings.

Periventricular white matter lesions and cognition

A positive association between the degree of cognitive decline and the presence of periventricular WML (PWML) was observed in four studies.15,18-19,23 The presence of PWML, in comparison with diffuse subcortical lesions, was more associated with global cognitive impairment in two studies.18,19 A greater severity of PWML was associated with more subjective complaints in the Cognitive Failure Questionnaire, a semi-structured instrument which evaluated the patient's perception of their own cognition.19 PWML was associated with specific cognitive skills, executive functions among them,15,42-43 and the processing of information.15 In one study the association with executive dysfunction occurred independently to the presence of lacunar infarcts.42 When compared with microangiopathy in frontal or occipito-parietal areas, diffuse subcortical lesions were also associated with a worse performance in executive tests (Digit Symbol, Trail-Making B).42

Extent of WMLs and cognition

Only one article suggested a threshold of WML related to executive dysfunction. The authors observed that when 50% of white matter was compromised executive dysfunction ensued.39


Discussion

The present review retrieved 29 studies on the issue, most with a cross sectional design (n=24). The limited number of prospective studies assessing the correlations of neuroimaging and cognitive features of SIVD may be explained partly by the high cost and the difficulties inherent to the recruitment and assessment of samples. Furthermore, prospective studies of this disease are often faced with high rates of mortality-morbidity which impact the control of possible biases (attrition, survival or performance).16

The majority of the studies (n=15) found a positive clinical association between executive dysfunction and subcortical dementia. Loss of frontal executive control is a major component of cognitive disability11 and may also show quantitative and qualitative differences between SIVD and other clinical groups (AD, cortical stroke patients), contributing as a method to validate the diagnostic criteria of subcortical disease, in addition to the assessment by brain imaging currently adopted.

The characteristic pattern of memory impairment presented by SIVD in the selected articles dovetails with previous literature and strengthens the hypothesis of possible different neurological pathways being involved in vascular and Alzheimer's disease. While retrieval and evocation processes are highly impaired in SIVD because of disruption in executive circuits,44-46 recognition with the help of clues (cued recall) is more preserved. On the other hand, encoding is severely impaired and cued recall tasks show a larger number of intrusions in AD.

In three studies,22,37,38 the cognitive assessment of Alzheimer and vascular patients demonstrated a pattern of double dissociation and reinforced previous literature outlining the frontal dysfunction as the most characteristic pattern of SIVD.47,48 The vascular group showed worse performance in executive control and graphomotor tasks,22 whereas they performed better than the AD patients in the assessment of delayed recall tasks with or without the help of clues. Furthermore, a clear dissociation was observed in the early stages of VaD and in AD. The former group showed more impairment of sensory-motor and attentional components whereas the latter presented worse performance on selective and divided attention.38

Studies on CADASIL, although few in number, offer an important diagnostic and prognostic model for the characterization of cognitive manifestations in subcortical vascular disease. They can also provide correlations with functional impairment and degree of cerebral lesion. Despite being rare, CADASIL merits interest as it can be considered a pure form of subcortical ischemic dementia. For this reason, longitudinal and multicentric studies could clarify the role of lacunes and WML in mood disorders and psychomotor and cognitive abnormalities in patients with this disease.49

Speed of psychomotor processing and some higher cortical functions such as language, visuo-spatial, and visuo-constructional abilities were also frequently reported.24,33-36 It is possible that slowing of mental speed may account for lower scores on cognitive tests as an independent variable. Studies with timed and non-timed executive tests have shown that slow performance places greater demands on the retention of information in working memory and associated neural circuits.30 As most neuropsychological protocols give emphasis to executive function,50 other aspects of neuropsychological functioning may have been underestimated and how language, visuo-spatial and visuo-motor skills can contribute in differentiating SIVD from other groups remains an open issue.

The importance of white matter disease as an isolated factor of cognitive impairment is frequently discussed,51 and some observations seem to suggest an effect which might be independent of large infarcts and degenerative lesions of AD.52 It is known that WML, like lacunar infarcts, can interrupt subcortical pre-frontal loops, leading to impaired functioning of the frontal lobe and to deficiency in the processing of information.11,46,53 There is evidence that periventricular white-matter lesions and subcortical white-matter lesions affect cognitive functions in different ways54,55 where some articles have explored this hypothesis. The main difference between these subcortical lesions is based on impaired neural pathways. While the periventricular WML damages long association fibers, in turn connected to distant cortical areas, lesions in short fibers result in the formation of more diffuse WML. Thus, WML abnormalities could compose disconnection syndromes, with diffuse WML more related to the interruption of local networks, whereas the periventricular lesions would lead to the impairment of functions which require coordination of multiple cortical areas distant from one another.12,56

One study found a threshold of WML for executive dysfunction,39 but the other twenty six drew no conclusion on this issue. According to the author, important limitations were associated to this finding. Although neuroimaging has a leading role, any proposition of a more measurable criterion for subcortical dementia has to balance not only the percentage of white matter lesions measured but also clinical and cognitive features, such as the influence of comorbid diseases (e.g., mixed dementia) and measures of other cognitive functions (memory and language impairments).39

In the majority of articles which included neuroimaging assessment (88.2% or 15 in 17 papers), the presence of subcortical lesions was strongly correlated to executive dysfunction and also with impairment in attention and visuo-constructional abilities and psychomotor slowing (see Tables). However, evidence regarding the role of extension and localization of WML in cognitive and functional dysfunctions showed conflicting results. This limitation is probably due to methodological issues and to the difficulties in differentiating the cognitive effects of concurrent pathologies, such as cortical lesions in AD. The former is related to differences in the settings of the studies and in socio-demographic variables, the small size effect on cognition of mild WML,57 the limited number of longitudinal studies and the short period of follow-up,58 and finally, differences in the criteria defining risk factors for cerebrovascular disease59 have hindered sound conclusions. In addition, inconsistent results have been collected because of the vast difference in methods of quantifying WML. Technical questions related to the acquisition and quality of cerebral images obtained by CT or MR, as well as the variations in the image contrast, resolutions and angles should also be noted.60 In relation to the latter aspect, post mortem studies have evidenced that typical AD pathology was associated to executive deficits in mild stages of dementia and coexisted with small vessel disease.61 Thus, it is possible that in some cases the impact of regional white matter lesions on cognition could be overestimated and not consider a developing degenerative process.

Concluding, the concept of subcortical dementia, however well-characterized in terms of neuropsychological alterations, still awaits definition of concomitant factors and overlapping conditions, such as the presence of white matter lesions, small artery lesions (not always easily identifiable by neuroimaging), cortical atrophy and degenerative lesions. In spite of this, the majority of the studies pointed to white matter lesions as an independent factor in cognitive decline. There appears to be a threshold for the impact of this effect and although this has not yet been clearly established, it seems certain that specific frontostriatal circuits are impaired in the process.

Acknowledgments - The authors thank Ms. Luzinete Alvarenga for her editorial assistance.


References

1. Almkvist O, Wahlund LO, Andersson-Lundman G, Basun H, Backman L. White-matter hyperintensity and neuropsychological functions in dementia and healthy aging. Arch Neurol 1992;49:626-632.

2. Soderlund H, Nyberg L, Adolfsson R, Nilsson LG, Launer LJ. High prevalence of white matter hyperintensities in normal aging: Relation to blood pressure and cognition. Cortex 2003;39:1093-1105.

3. Paul RH, Haque O, Gunstad J, et al. Subcortical hyperintensities impact cognitive function among a select subset of healthy elderly. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 2005;20:697-704.

4. Chui H. Dementia due to subcortical ischaemic vascular disease. Clinical Cornerstone 2001;3:40-51.

5. Erkinjuntti T. Subcortical ischemic vascular disease and dementia. Int Psychogeriatr 2003;15(suppl 1):23-26.

6. Erkinjuntti T, Inzitari D, Pantoni L, et al. Research criteria for subcortical vascular dementia in clinical trials. J Neural Transm Suppl 2000;59:23-30.

7. Erkinjuntti T, Inzitari D, Pantoni L, et al. Limitations of clinical criteria for the diagnosis of vascular dementia in clinical trials. Is a focus on subcortical vascular dementia a solution? Ann NY Acad Sci 2000; 903: 262-72.

8. Pantoni L, Rossi R, Inzitari D, et al. Efficacy and safety of nimodipine in subcortical vascular dementia: A subgroup analysis of the Scandinavian multi-infarct dementia trial. J Neurol Sci 2000;175:124-134.

9. Brun A. Vascular burden of the white matter. Int Psychogeriatr 2003;15(suppl 1):53-58.

10. Ishii N, Nishihara Y, Imamura T. Why do frontal lobe symptoms predominate in vascular dementia with lacunes? Neurology 1986;36:340-345.

11. Román GC, Erkinjuntti T, Wallin A, Pantoni L, Chui HC. Subcortical ischaemic vascular dementia. Lancet Neurol 2002;1:426-436.

12. Wolfe N, Linn R, Babikian VL, Knoefel JE, Albert ML. Frontal systems impairment following multiple lacunar infarcts. Arch Neurol 1990;47:129-132.

13. Cummings JL. Frontal-subcortical circuits and human behavior. Arch Neurol 1993;50:873-880.

14. Román GC, Royall DR. Executive control function: a rational basis for the diagnosis of vascular dementia. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 1999;13(suppl 3):69-80.

15. Prins ND, van Dijk EJ, den Heijer T, et al. Cerebral small-vessel disease and decline in information processing speed, executive function and memory. Brain 2005;128:2034-2041.

16. Ferro JM, Madureira S. Age-related white matter changes and cognitive impairment. J Neurol Sci 2002;203-204:221-225.

17. Skoog I, Berg S, Johansson B, Palmertz B, Andreasson LA. The influence of white matter lesions on neuropsychological functioning in demented and non-demented 85-year olds. Acta Neurol Scand 1996;93:142-148.

18. de Groot JC, de Leeuw FE, Oudkerk M, et al. Cerebral white matter lesions and cognitive function: the Rotterdam Scan Study. Ann Neurol 2000;47:145-151 19. de Groot JC, de Leeuw F-E, Achten E, et al. Prevalence of cerebral white matter lesions in elderly people: a population based magnetic resonance imaging study. The Rotterdam Scan Study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2001;70:9-14.

20. Moretti R, Torre P, Antonello RM, Cazzato G, Bava A, Manos PJ. Use of the ten-point clock test to compare executive functioning across 24 months in patients with subcortical vascular dementia. Percept Mot Skills 2005;100:207-216.

21. Moretti R, Torre P, Antonello RM, Cattaruzza T, Cazzato G, Bava A. Frontal lobe dementia and subcortical vascular dementia: a neuropsychological comparison. Psychol Rep 2005;96:141-151.

22. Libon DJ, Bogdanoff B, Bonavita J, et al. Dementia associated with periventricular and deep white matter alterations: a subtype of subcortical dementia. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 1997;12:239-250.

23. Libon DJ, Bogdanoff B, Cloud BS, et al. Declarative and procedural learning, quantitative measures of the hippocampus, and subcortical white alterations in Alzheimer's disease and ischaemic vascular dementia. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 1998;20:30-41.

24. Moser DJ, Cohen RA, Paul RH, et al. Executive function and magnetic resonance imaging subcortical hyperintensities in vascular dementia. Neuropsychiatry Neuropsychol Behav Neurol 2001;14:89-92.

25. Jokinen H, Kalska H, Mantyla R, et al. White matter hyperintensities as a predictor of neuropsychological deficits post-stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2005;76:1229-1233.

26. Pohjasvaara T, Mantyla R, Ylikoski R, Kaste M, Erkinjuntti T. Clinical features of MRI-defined subcortical vascular disease. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 2003;17:236-242.

27. Kramer JH, Reed BR, Mungas D, Weiner MW, Chui HC. Executive dysfunction in subcortical ischaemic vascular disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2002;72:217-220.

28. Mok VC, Wong A, Lam WWM, et al. Cognitive impairment and functional outcome after stroke associated with small vessel disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2004;75:560-566.

29. Cloud BS, Swenson R, Malamut BL, et al. The Boston Revision of the Wechsler Memory Scale-Mental Control subtest. Presented at the 22nd annual meeting of the International Neuropsychological Society, Cincinnati, OH, 1994.

30. O'Sullivan M, Morris RG, Markus HS. Brief cognitive assessment for patients with cerebral small vessel disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2005;76:1140-1145.

31. Amberla K, Waljas M, Tuominen S, et al. Insidious cognitive decline in CADASIL. Stroke 2004;35:1598-1602.

32. Peters N, Opherk C, Danek A, Ballard C, Herzog J, Dichgans M. The pattern of cognitive performance in CADASIL: a monogenic condition leading to subcortical ischemic vascular dementia. Am J Psychiatry 2005;162:2078-2085.

33. Cohen RA, Paul RH, Ott BR, et al. The relationship of subcortical MRI hyperintensities and brain volume to cognitive function in vascular dementia. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2002;8:743-752.

34. Doddy RS, Massman PJ, Mawad M, Nance M. Cognitive consequences of subcortical magnetic resonance imaging changes in Alzheimer's disease: comparison to small vessel ischemic vascular dementia. Neuropsychiatry Neuropsychol Behav Neurol 1998;11:191-199.

35. Frisoni GB, Galluzzi S, Bresciani L, Zanetti O, Geroldi C. Mild cognitive impairment with subcortical vascular features: clinical characteristics and outcome. J Neurol 2002;249: 1423-1432.

36. Galluzzi S, Sheu C-F, Zanetti O, Frisoni GB. Distinctive clinical features of mild cognitive impairment with subcortical cerebrovascular disease. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2005;19:196-203.

37. Tierney MC, Black SE, Szalai JP, et al. Recognition memory and verbal fluency differentiate probable Alzheimer disease from subcortical ischemic vascular Dementia. Arch Neurol 2001;58:1654-1659.

38. Gainotti G, Marra C, Villa G. A double dissociation between accuracy and time of execution on attentional tasks in Alzheimer's disease and multi-infarct dementia. Brain 2001;124:731-738.

39. Price CC, Jefferson AL, Merino JG, Heilman KM, Libon DJ. Subcortical vascular dementia: integrating neuropsychological and neuroradiologic data. Neurology 2005;65:376-382.

40. Sabri O, Ringelstein EB, Hellwig D, et al. Neuropsychological impairment correlates with hypoperfusion and hypometabolism but not with severity of white matter lesions on MRI in patients with cerebral microangiopathy. Stroke 1999;30: 556-566.

41. de Mendonça A, Ribeiro F, Guerreiro M, Palma T, Garcia C. Clinical significance of subcortical vascular disease in patients with mild cognitive impairment. Eur J Neurol 2005;12: 125-130.

42. van Swieten JC, Staal S, Kappelle LJ, Derix MM, van Gijn J. Are white matter lesions directly associated with cognitive impairment in patients with lacunar infarcts? J Neurol 1996;243:196-200.

43. Reed BR, Eberling JL, Mungas D, Weiner M, Kramer JH, Jagust WJ. Effects of white matter lesions and lacunes on cortical function. Arch Neurol 2004;61:1545-1550.

44. Alexander GE, DeLong MR, Strick PL. Parallel organization of functionally segregated circuits linking basal ganglia and cortex. Ann Rev Neurosci 1986;9:357-381.

45. Takashima Y, Yao H, Koga H, et al. Frontal lobe dysfunction caused by multiple lacunar infarction in community dwelling elderly subjects. J Neurol Sci 2003;214:37-41.

46. Tekin S, Cummings JL. Frontal-subcortical neuronal circuits and clinical neuropsychiatry: an update. J Psychosom Res 2002;53:647-654.

47. Perry RJ, Hodges JR. Attention and executive deficits in Alzheimer´s disease. A critical review. Brain 1999;122:383-404.

48. Perry RJ, Watson P, Hodges JR. The nature and staging of attention dysfunction in early (minimal and mild) Alzheimer´s disease: relation to episodic and semantic memory impairment. Neuropsychologia 2000;38:252-271.

49. Pantoni L, Basile AM, Pracucci G, et al. Impact of age-related cerebral white matter changes on the transition to disability - the LADIS study: rationale, design and methodology. Neuroepidemiology 2005;24:51-62.

50. Looi JCL, Sachdev OS. Vascular dementia as a frontal subcortical system dysfunction. Psychol Med 2000;30:997-1003.

51. Wolf H, Ecke GM, Bettin S, Dietrich J, Gertz HJ. Do white matter changes contribute to the subsequent development of dementia in patients with mild cognitive impairment? A longitudinal study. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2000;15:803-812.

52. Esiri MM. Which vascular lesions are of importance in vascular dementia? Ann NY Acad Sci 2000;903:239-243.

53. Cummings JL. Frontal-subcortical circuits and human behavior. J Psychosom Res 1998;44:627-628.

54. Filley CM. The behavioral neurology of cereral white matter. Neurology 1998;50:1535-1540.

55. Fazekas F, Kleinert R, Offenbacher H, et al. Pathological correlates of incidental MRI white matter signal hyperintensities. Neurology 1993;43:1683-1689.

56. Mesulam MM. Large-scale neurocognitive networks and distributed processing for attention, language and memory. Ann Neurol 1990;28:597-613.

57. Ross ED, Hansel SL, Orbelo DM, Monnot M. Relationship of leukoaraiosis to cognitive decline and cognitive aging. Cogn Behav Neurol 2005;18:89-97.

58. Garde E, Mortensen EL, Krabbe K, Rostrup E, Larsson HBW. Relation between age-related decline in intelligence and cerebral white-matter hyperintensities in healthy octogenarians: A longitudinal study. Lancet 2000;356:628-634.

59. Pantoni L. Pathophysiology of age-related cerebral white matter changes. Cerebrovasc Dis 2002;13(suppl 2):7-10.

60. Wen HM, Mok VC, Fan YH, et al. Effect of white matter changes on cognitive impairment in patients with lacunar infarcts. Stroke 2004;35:1826-1830.

61. Reed BR, Mungas DM, Kramer JH, et al. Profiles of neuropsychological impairment in autopsy-defined Alzheimer's disease and cerebrovascular disease. Brain 2007;130:731-739.








1 Institute of Psychiatry, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
2 Institute of Neurology, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
3 Radiology Service of the Procardíaco Hospital, Brazil.
4 State University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Gilberto Sousa Alves - Rua Otaviano Hudson, 16 / 608 - 22030-030 Rio de Janeiro RJ - Brazil. E-mail: gsalves123@hotmail.com

Received February 14, 2008. Accepted in final form May 6, 2008.

 

Home Contact